CTRI/2019/07/020163Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Comparison of retention of a moisture tolerant pit and fissure sealant with resin based conventional pit and fissure sealant.
Dr Keerthy S0 sites0 target enrollmentStarted: TBDLast updated:
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sponsor
Study Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •High dental caries risk prone children
Exclusion Criteria
- •Children with one molar on either side which is grossly carious or restored.
- •Uncooperative children/children not willing to participate
- •Molar teeth with antagonist tooth not present or extracted
- •Children with dental fluorosis
- •Children with habits like bruxism
- •Children with rampant caries
Investigators
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
retention of pit and fissure sealant with and without 38% silver diamine fluorideCTRI/2024/01/062040VSPM Dental college and Research centre
Not yet recruiting
Phase 3
Retention of pit and fissure sealants placed with Enamel Deproteinization pre-treatment among adolescents- RCTCTRI/2021/09/036409SELF FUNDED Dr SWATISHREE SAHOO
Completed
Phase 2
Comparison of pit and fissure sealant retention following bioactive glass air abrasioo.-IRCT2014060117934N1Vice chancellor for research, Isfahan Univercity of Medical Sciences180
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison between two different technique of applying fissure sealant on permenant molar teethon-cavitated teethfully erupted toothNon-cavitated teethOral and Gastrointestinal - Other diseases of the mouth, teeth, oesophagus, digestive system including liver and colonACTRN12619001250123yazeed magbul althomali160
Active, not recruiting
Phase 4
A clinical trial to compare the efficacy of two bonding agent used for orthodontic purpose.CTRI/2024/03/064374Radheya Agrawal