跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02494934
NCT02494934已完成不适用

A Randomized Comparison of Individual Cognitive-behavioural Therapy and Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation in the Treatment of Provoked Vestibulodynia

Queen's University0 个研究点目标入组 20 人开始时间: 2009年9月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
20
主要终点
change from baseline in pain with sexual intercourse at 12 weeks

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of the study was to compare the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and physical therapy (PT) on pain and psychosexual outcomes in women with provoked vestibulodynia (PVD).

详细描述

Provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) is the most common condition leading to painful intercourse and is currently best understood within a biopsychosocial framework. Although the usefulness of non-medical treatment options for vulvar pain is recognized by many, there is limited research investigating the effectiveness of these treatments using a biopsychosocial approach to outcome measurement. Furthermore, there is little evidence to support the mechanisms by which these treatments lead to pain reduction. This study aimed to address these gaps by investigating two non-medical treatment options: individual cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) and physical therapy (PT).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • fluent in English
  • vulvar pain with attempted vaginal penetration for at least 6 months
  • pain limited to vulvar vestibule during cotton swab test

排除标准

  • other serious medical, psychiatric, or other pain conditions
  • generalized vulvodynia and/or significant vaginismus (i.e., not able to have at least one finger inserted vaginally)
  • current pregnancy, breastfeeding, or being less than 6 months postpartum
  • unwillingness to abstain from other treatments for their PVD pain during the course of the study

结局指标

主要结局

change from baseline in pain with sexual intercourse at 12 weeks

时间窗: Baseline, 12 weeks

measured on an 11-point numerical rating scale

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr. Caroline Pukall

Professor

Queen's University

相似试验