MedPath

A Safety and Effectiveness Study of JUVÉDERM VOLIFT® XC Versus Control for Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds
Interventions
Device: JUVEDERM VOLIFT® XC
Device: Control
Registration Number
NCT01976663
Lead Sponsor
Allergan
Brief Summary

A prospective, multicenter, within-subject controlled study of the safety and effectiveness of JUVÉDERM VOLIFT® XC versus Control for the correction of moderate to severe nasolabial folds (NLFs).

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
126
Inclusion Criteria
  • 2 visible moderate to severe nasolabial folds
  • Agree to refrain from undergoing other anti-wrinkle/volumizing treatments in the lower two-thirds of the face for the duration of the study
Exclusion Criteria
  • Undergone facial tissue augmentation with dermal fillers in the lower two-thirds of the face within the past 12 months
  • Undergone facial tissue augmentation with fat injections, botulinum toxin injections in the lower two-thirds of the face, mesotherapy, or cosmetic facial procedures in the face or neck within the past 6 months
  • Received semi-permanent fillers or permanent facial implants anywhere in the lower face

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
VOLIFT® XC NLFsJUVEDERM VOLIFT® XCNasolabial folds treated with JUVEDERM VOLIFT® XC.
Control NLFsControlNasolabial folds treated with Control.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean Change From Baseline in Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-Point Nasolabial Fold Severity Scale (NLFSS)Baseline, Month 6

Nasolabial fold severity is assessed by the Evaluating Investigator on the 5-point Nasolabial Fold Severity Scale (ranging from 0=None \[no wrinkle\] to 4=Extreme \[very deep wrinkle, redundant fold\]). Mean change from baseline in NFLSS is defined as score at baseline minus score at Month 6. A negative number change from baseline indicated improvement and a positive number change from baseline indicated worsening.

Percentage of Nasolabial Folds With ≥1-Point ImprovementBaseline, Month 6

Nasolabial fold severity is evaluated by the Evaluating Investigator on the 5-point Nasolabial Fold Severity Scale (ranging from 0=None \[no wrinkle\] to 4=Extreme \[very deep wrinkle, redundant fold\]). The percentage of nasolabial folds with ≥1-point improvement from baseline (i.e., decrease in severity) are reported.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Nasolabial Folds With ≥1-Point ImprovementBaseline, Month 12

Nasolabial fold severity is evaluated by the Evaluating Investigator on the 5-point Nasolabial Fold Severity Scale (ranging from 0=None \[no wrinkle\] to 4=Extreme \[very deep wrinkle, redundant fold\]). The percentage of nasolabial folds with ≥1-point improvement from baseline (i.e., decrease in severity) are reported.

Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Nasolabial Folds FACE-Q ScoreBaseline, Month 12

Subjects evaluate nasolabial folds on the 5-item Nasolabial Folds module of the FACE-Q questionnaire. Responses to the 5 items are combined to create a scale score that ranged from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates that the subject is extremely bothered and 100 indicates that the subject is not all bothered by the appearance of the nasolabial fold. Change from baseline is defined as the score at Month 12 minus the baseline score. A positive number change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative number change from baseline indicates a worsening.

Trial Locations

Locations (4)

Total Skin and Beauty Dermatology Center P.C.

🇺🇸

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Vitiligo and Pigmentation Institute of Southern California

🇺🇸

Los Angeles, California, United States

Skin Research Institute

🇺🇸

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Dermatology Research Institute, LLC

🇺🇸

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath