A Study to Compare the Press Fit Condylar (P.F.C.) Sigma Rotating-platform High-flexion (RP-F) Versus the Press Fit Condylar (P.F.C.) Sigma Rotating-platform (RP) Knee Implants
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- Interventions
- Device: PFC Sigma RPDevice: PFC Sigma RP-F
- Registration Number
- NCT00733369
- Lead Sponsor
- DePuy International
- Brief Summary
The main objective of this study is to determine if the P.F.C. Sigma RP-F Knee delivers a greater post-operative range of motion (ROM) compared with the P.F.C. Sigma RP Knee in primary TKA.
The secondary objectives of this investigation are to evaluate the clinical and patient outcomes and survivorship associated with the DePuy P.F.C. Sigma RP-F and RP Posterior Stabilised (PS) Knee over 5 years.
- Detailed Description
Primary Outcome: Change from pre-operative range of motion at 1 year between patients receiving P.F.C. Sigma RP vs P.F.C. Sigma RP-F
Secondary endpoints: Comparative evaluation of any post-operative variation between subjects receiving primary TKA with either of the above devices in terms of Knee and Osteoarthritis Scores (KOOS), American Knee Society Score (AKS), EQ-5D Score and Oxford Knee Score (OKS)
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 106
- Male or female subjects, aged between 45 and 75 years inclusive.
- Subjects who are able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this clinical investigation and from whom consent has been obtained.
- Subjects who, in the opinion of the Clinical Investigator, are able to understand this clinical investigation, co-operate with the investigational procedures and are willing to return to the hospital for all the required post-operative follow-ups.
- Subjects who present with osteoarthritis that in the opinion of the clinical investigator requires a primary total knee arthroplasty.
- Subjects who in the opinion of the Clinical Investigator are considered to be suitable for treatment with either the P.F.C Sigma RP-F or the P.F.C Sigma RP knee, according to the indications specified in the package insert leaflet.
- Subjects who have authorised the transfer of his/her pseudonymised information to DePuy.
- Subjects who, in the opinion of the Clinical Investigator, have an existing condition that would compromise their participation and follow-up in this clinical investigation.
- Female subjects who are pregnant or lactating.
- Subjects who are known drug or alcohol abusers or with psychological disorders that could affect follow-up care or treatment outcomes.
- Subjects who have participated in a clinical investigation with an investigational product in the last month( 30 days).
- Subjects who are currently involved in any injury litigation claims.
- Subjects with a known history of poor compliance to medical treatment.
- Subjects who have previously had an osteotomy or significant surgery in the affected knee.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description PFC Sigma RP PFC Sigma RP 125 patients to be allocated to this arm according to blinding envelopes PFC Sigma RP-F PFC Sigma RP-F 125 patients to be allocated to this arm according to blinding envelopes
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change From Pre-op to 1 Year Range of Motion. 1 year Range of motion is knee flexion (how far the patient can bend their knee) minus knee extension (how far the patient can straighten their knee). The result of this subtraction is the range of motion (bending and straightening) for that knee.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To Compare the Change in KOOS Pain Score From Pre-Op to 2 Years Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 2 years The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a patient reported outcome that evaluates the short and long-term symptoms and function in subjects with knee injury and osteoarthritis. It consists of 5 separately scored subscales - Pain, Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation, and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL) - ranging from 0 to 100 point score (where 100 indicates the best outcome).
To Compare the Change in KOOS Symptoms Score From Pre-Op to 5 Years Post Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 5 years The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a patient reported outcome that evaluates the short and long-term symptoms and function in subjects with knee injury and osteoarthritis. It consists of 5 separately scored subscales - Pain, Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation, and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL) - ranging from 0 to 100 point score (where 100 indicates the best outcome).
To Compare the Change in KOOS ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Score From Pre-Op to 1 Year Post Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 1 year The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a patient reported outcome that evaluates the short and long-term symptoms and function in subjects with knee injury and osteoarthritis. It consists of 5 separately scored subscales - Pain, Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation, and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL) - ranging from 0 to 100 point score (where 100 indicates the best outcome).
To Compare the Change in KOOS Pain Score From Pre-Op to 5 Years Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 5 years The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a patient reported outcome that evaluates the short and long-term symptoms and function in subjects with knee injury and osteoarthritis. It consists of 5 separately scored subscales - Pain, Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation, and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL) - ranging from 0 to 100 point score (where 100 indicates the best outcome).
To Compare the Change in KOOS Symptoms Score From Pre-Op to 1 Year Post Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 1 year The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a patient reported outcome that evaluates the short and long-term symptoms and function in subjects with knee injury and osteoarthritis. It consists of 5 separately scored subscales - Pain, Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation, and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL) - ranging from 0 to 100 point score (where 100 indicates the best outcome).
To Compare the Change in KOOS Symptoms Score From Pre-Op to 2 Years Post Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 2 years The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a patient reported outcome that evaluates the short and long-term symptoms and function in subjects with knee injury and osteoarthritis. It consists of 5 separately scored subscales - Pain, Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation, and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL) - ranging from 0 to 100 point score (where 100 indicates the best outcome).
To Compare the Change in KOOS ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Score From Pre-Op to 2 Years Post Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 2 years The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a patient reported outcome that evaluates the short and long-term symptoms and function in subjects with knee injury and osteoarthritis. It consists of 5 separately scored subscales - Pain, Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation, and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL) - ranging from 0 to 100 point score (where 100 indicates the best outcome).
To Compare the Change in KOOS ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Score From Pre-Op to 3 to 6 Months Post Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 3-6 months The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a patient reported outcome that evaluates the short and long-term symptoms and function in subjects with knee injury and osteoarthritis. It consists of 5 separately scored subscales - Pain, Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation, and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL) - ranging from 0 to 100 point score (where 100 indicates the best outcome).
To Compare the Change in KOOS Pain Score From Pre-Op to 3 to 6 Months Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 3-6 months The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a patient reported outcome that evaluates the short and long-term symptoms and function in subjects with knee injury and osteoarthritis. It consists of 5 separately scored subscales - Pain, Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation, and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL) - ranging from 0 to 100 point score (where 100 indicates the best outcome).
To Compare the Change in KOOS Symptoms Score From Pre-Op to 3 to 6 Months Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 3-6 months The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a patient reported outcome that evaluates the short and long-term symptoms and function in subjects with knee injury and osteoarthritis. It consists of 5 separately scored subscales - Pain, Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation, and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL) - ranging from 0 to 100 point score (where 100 indicates the best outcome).
To Compare the Change in KOOS ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Score From Pre-Op to 5 Years Post Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 5 years The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a patient reported outcome that evaluates the short and long-term symptoms and function in subjects with knee injury and osteoarthritis. It consists of 5 separately scored subscales - Pain, Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation, and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL) - ranging from 0 to 100 point score (where 100 indicates the best outcome).
To Compare the Change in KOOS SPORTS and RECREATION Score From Pre-Op to 1 Year Post Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 1 year The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a patient reported outcome that evaluates the short and long-term symptoms and function in subjects with knee injury and osteoarthritis. It consists of 5 separately scored subscales - Pain, Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation, and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL) - ranging from 0 to 100 point score (where 100 indicates the best outcome).
To Compare the Change in KOOS SPORTS and RECREATION Score From Pre-Op to 2 Years Post Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 2 years The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a patient reported outcome that evaluates the short and long-term symptoms and function in subjects with knee injury and osteoarthritis. It consists of 5 separately scored subscales - Pain, Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation, and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL) - ranging from 0 to 100 point score (where 100 indicates the best outcome).
To Compare the Change in KOOS SPORTS and RECREATION Score From Pre-Op to 5 Years Post Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 5 years The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a patient reported outcome that evaluates the short and long-term symptoms and function in subjects with knee injury and osteoarthritis. It consists of 5 separately scored subscales - Pain, Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation, and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL) - ranging from 0 to 100 point score (where 100 indicates the best outcome).
To Compare the Change in KOOS QOL (Quality of Life) Score From Pre-Op to 3 to 6 Months Post Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 3-6 months The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a patient reported outcome that evaluates the short and long-term symptoms and function in subjects with knee injury and osteoarthritis. It consists of 5 separately scored subscales - Pain, Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation, and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL) - ranging from 0 to 100 point score (where 100 indicates the best outcome).
To Compare the Change in American Knee Society (AKS) Knee Score From Pre-Op to 3 to 6 Months Post Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 3 - 6 months American Knee Society (AKS) knee score is a 0-100 point score (where 100 indicates excellent knee condition) that evaluates the affected knee. The knee score is composed of Pain, Range of Motion, and Stability.
To Compare the Change in KOOS Pain Score From Pre-Op to 1 Year Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 1 year The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a patient reported outcome that evaluates the short and long-term symptoms and function in subjects with knee injury and osteoarthritis. It consists of 5 separately scored subscales - Pain, Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation, and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL) - ranging from 0 to 100 point score (where 100 indicates the best outcome).
To Compare the Change in American Knee Society (AKS) Function Score From Pre-Op to 3 to 6 Months Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 3 - 6 months American Knee Society (AKS) function score is a 0-100 point score (where 100 indicates excellent knee function) that evaluates the affected knee.
To Compare the Change in American Knee Society (AKS) Function Score From Pre-Op to 1 Year Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 1 year American Knee Society (AKS) function score is a 0-100 point score (where 100 indicates excellent knee function) that evaluates the affected knee.
To Compare the Change in Oxford Knee Score (OKS) From Pre-Op to 3 to 6 Months Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 3 - 6 months The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a 12 to 60 point patient reported outcome (PRO) score (where 12 indicates the best outcome) that evaluates the affected knee. The total score is composed of Pain and Function.
To Compare the Change in EQ-5D3L MOBILITY Score From Pre-Op to 1 Year Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 1 year EQ-5D3L is a patient reported standardized instrument used to measure health that comprises of 5 descriptive dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression; and 1 visual analog scale (VAS) that measures health. The descriptive dimensions each have 3 levels: no problems (scored as 1), some problems (scored as 2), and extreme problems (scored as 3); whereas the VAS measure ranges from 0 to 100 where 100 is the best imaginable health state.
To Compare the Change in EQ-5D3L MOBILITY Score From Pre-Op to 5 Years Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 5 years EQ-5D3L is a patient reported standardized instrument used to measure health that comprises of 5 descriptive dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression; and 1 visual analog scale (VAS) that measures health. The descriptive dimensions each have 3 levels: no problems (scored as 1), some problems (scored as 2), and extreme problems (scored as 3); whereas the VAS measure ranges from 0 to 100 where 100 is the best imaginable health state.
To Compare the Change in EQ-5D3L Self-Care Score From Pre-Op to 5 Years Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 5 years EQ-5D3L is a patient reported standardized instrument used to measure health that comprises of 5 descriptive dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression; and 1 visual analog scale (VAS) that measures health. The descriptive dimensions each have 3 levels: no problems (scored as 1), some problems (scored as 2), and extreme problems (scored as 3); whereas the VAS measure ranges from 0 to 100 where 100 is the best imaginable health state.
To Compare the Change in KOOS SPORTS and RECREATION Score From Pre-Op to 3 to 6 Months Post Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 3-6 months The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a patient reported outcome that evaluates the short and long-term symptoms and function in subjects with knee injury and osteoarthritis. It consists of 5 separately scored subscales - Pain, Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation, and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL) - ranging from 0 to 100 point score (where 100 indicates the best outcome).
To Compare the Change in American Knee Society (AKS) Knee Score From Pre-Op to 2 Years Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 2 years American Knee Society (AKS) knee score is a 0-100 point score (where 100 indicates excellent knee condition) that evaluates the affected knee. The knee score is composed of Pain, Range of Motion, and Stability.
To Compare the Change in American Knee Society (AKS) Knee Score From Pre-Op to 5 Years Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 5 years American Knee Society (AKS) knee score is a 0-100 point score (where 100 indicates excellent knee condition) that evaluates the affected knee. The knee score is composed of Pain, Range of Motion, and Stability.
To Compare the Change in American Knee Society (AKS) Function Score From Pre-Op to 5 Years Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 5 years American Knee Society (AKS) function score is a 0-100 point score (where 100 indicates excellent knee function) that evaluates the affected knee.
To Compare the Change in Oxford Knee Score (OKS) From Pre-Op to 1 Year Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 1 year The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a 12 to 60 point patient reported outcome (PRO) score (where 12 indicates the best outcome) that evaluates the affected knee. The total score is composed of Pain and Function.
To Compare the Change in Oxford Knee Score (OKS) From Pre-Op to 5 Years Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 5 years The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a 12 to 60 point patient reported outcome (PRO) score (where 12 indicates the best outcome) that evaluates the affected knee. The total score is composed of Pain and Function.
To Compare the Change in EQ-5D3L MOBILITY Score From Pre-Op to 3 to 6 Months Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 3 - 6 months EQ-5D3L is a patient reported standardized instrument used to measure health that comprises of 5 descriptive dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression; and 1 visual analog scale (VAS) that measures health. The descriptive dimensions each have 3 levels: no problems (scored as 1), some problems (scored as 2), and extreme problems (scored as 3); whereas the VAS measure ranges from 0 to 100 where 100 is the best imaginable health state.
To Compare the Change in EQ-5D3L VAS Score From Pre-Op to 1 Year Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 1 year EQ-5D3L is a patient reported standardized instrument used to measure health that comprises of 5 descriptive dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression; and 1 visual analog scale (VAS) that measures health. The descriptive dimensions each have 3 levels: no problems (scored as 1), some problems (scored as 2), and extreme problems (scored as 3); whereas the VAS measure ranges from 0 to 100 where 100 is the best imaginable health state.
To Compare the Change in KOOS QOL (Quality of Life) Score From Pre-Op to 1 Year Post Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 1 year The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a patient reported outcome that evaluates the short and long-term symptoms and function in subjects with knee injury and osteoarthritis. It consists of 5 separately scored subscales - Pain, Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation, and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL) - ranging from 0 to 100 point score (where 100 indicates the best outcome).
To Compare the Change in KOOS QOL (Quality of Life) Score From Pre-Op to 2 Years Post Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 2 years The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a patient reported outcome that evaluates the short and long-term symptoms and function in subjects with knee injury and osteoarthritis. It consists of 5 separately scored subscales - Pain, Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation, and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL) - ranging from 0 to 100 point score (where 100 indicates the best outcome).
To Compare the Change in KOOS QOL (Quality of Life) Score From Pre-Op to 5 Years Post Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 5 years The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a patient reported outcome that evaluates the short and long-term symptoms and function in subjects with knee injury and osteoarthritis. It consists of 5 separately scored subscales - Pain, Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation, and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL) - ranging from 0 to 100 point score (where 100 indicates the best outcome).
To Compare the Change in EQ-5D3L MOBILITY Score From Pre-Op to 2 Years Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 2 years EQ-5D3L is a patient reported standardized instrument used to measure health that comprises of 5 descriptive dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression; and 1 visual analog scale (VAS) that measures health. The descriptive dimensions each have 3 levels: no problems (scored as 1), some problems (scored as 2), and extreme problems (scored as 3); whereas the VAS measure ranges from 0 to 100 where 100 is the best imaginable health state.
To Compare the Change in American Knee Society (AKS) Knee Score From Pre-Op to 1 Year Post Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 1 year American Knee Society (AKS) knee score is a 0-100 point score (where 100 indicates excellent knee condition) that evaluates the affected knee. The knee score is composed of Pain, Range of Motion, and Stability.
To Compare the Change in EQ-5D3L Self-Care Score From Pre-Op to 2 Years Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 2 years EQ-5D3L is a patient reported standardized instrument used to measure health that comprises of 5 descriptive dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression; and 1 visual analog scale (VAS) that measures health. The descriptive dimensions each have 3 levels: no problems (scored as 1), some problems (scored as 2), and extreme problems (scored as 3); whereas the VAS measure ranges from 0 to 100 where 100 is the best imaginable health state.
To Compare the Change in EQ-5D3L Usual Activities Score From Pre-Op to 2 Years Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 2 years EQ-5D3L is a patient reported standardized instrument used to measure health that comprises of 5 descriptive dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression; and 1 visual analog scale (VAS) that measures health. The descriptive dimensions each have 3 levels: no problems (scored as 1), some problems (scored as 2), and extreme problems (scored as 3); whereas the VAS measure ranges from 0 to 100 where 100 is the best imaginable health state.
To Compare the Change in EQ-5D3L Anxiety/Depression Score From Pre-Op to 3 to 6 Months Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 3 - 6 months EQ-5D3L is a patient reported standardized instrument used to measure health that comprises of 5 descriptive dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression; and 1 visual analog scale (VAS) that measures health. The descriptive dimensions each have 3 levels: no problems (scored as 1), some problems (scored as 2), and extreme problems (scored as 3); whereas the VAS measure ranges from 0 to 100 where 100 is the best imaginable health state.
To Compare the Change in American Knee Society (AKS) Function Score From Pre-Op to 2 Years Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 2 years American Knee Society (AKS) function score is a 0-100 point score (where 100 indicates excellent knee function) that evaluates the affected knee.
To Compare the Change in Oxford Knee Score (OKS) From Pre-Op to 2 Years Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 2 years The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a 12 to 60 point patient reported outcome (PRO) score (where 12 indicates the best outcome) that evaluates the affected knee. The total score is composed of Pain and Function.
To Compare the Change in EQ-5D3L Self-Care Score From Pre-Op to 3 to 6 Months Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 3 - 6 months EQ-5D3L is a patient reported standardized instrument used to measure health that comprises of 5 descriptive dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression; and 1 visual analog scale (VAS) that measures health. The descriptive dimensions each have 3 levels: no problems (scored as 1), some problems (scored as 2), and extreme problems (scored as 3); whereas the VAS measure ranges from 0 to 100 where 100 is the best imaginable health state.
To Compare the Change in EQ-5D3L Self-Care Score From Pre-Op to 1 Year Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 1 year EQ-5D3L is a patient reported standardized instrument used to measure health that comprises of 5 descriptive dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression; and 1 visual analog scale (VAS) that measures health. The descriptive dimensions each have 3 levels: no problems (scored as 1), some problems (scored as 2), and extreme problems (scored as 3); whereas the VAS measure ranges from 0 to 100 where 100 is the best imaginable health state.
To Compare the Change in EQ-5D3L Pain/Discomfort Score From Pre-Op to 5 Years Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 5 years EQ-5D3L is a patient reported standardized instrument used to measure health that comprises of 5 descriptive dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression; and 1 visual analog scale (VAS) that measures health. The descriptive dimensions each have 3 levels: no problems (scored as 1), some problems (scored as 2), and extreme problems (scored as 3); whereas the VAS measure ranges from 0 to 100 where 100 is the best imaginable health state.
To Compare the Change in EQ-5D3L Anxiety/Depression Score From Pre-Op to 2 Years Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 2 years EQ-5D3L is a patient reported standardized instrument used to measure health that comprises of 5 descriptive dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression; and 1 visual analog scale (VAS) that measures health. The descriptive dimensions each have 3 levels: no problems (scored as 1), some problems (scored as 2), and extreme problems (scored as 3); whereas the VAS measure ranges from 0 to 100 where 100 is the best imaginable health state.
To Compare the Change in EQ-5D3L VAS Score From Pre-Op to 3 to 6 Months Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 3 - 6 months EQ-5D3L is a patient reported standardized instrument used to measure health that comprises of 5 descriptive dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression; and 1 visual analog scale (VAS) that measures health. The descriptive dimensions each have 3 levels: no problems (scored as 1), some problems (scored as 2), and extreme problems (scored as 3); whereas the VAS measure ranges from 0 to 100 where 100 is the best imaginable health state.
To Compare the Change in EQ-5D3L VAS Score From Pre-Op to 2 Years Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 2 years EQ-5D3L is a patient reported standardized instrument used to measure health that comprises of 5 descriptive dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression; and 1 visual analog scale (VAS) that measures health. The descriptive dimensions each have 3 levels: no problems (scored as 1), some problems (scored as 2), and extreme problems (scored as 3); whereas the VAS measure ranges from 0 to 100 where 100 is the best imaginable health state.
To Compare the Change in EQ-5D3L Usual Activities Score From Pre-Op to 3 to 6 Months Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 3 - 6 months EQ-5D3L is a patient reported standardized instrument used to measure health that comprises of 5 descriptive dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression; and 1 visual analog scale (VAS) that measures health. The descriptive dimensions each have 3 levels: no problems (scored as 1), some problems (scored as 2), and extreme problems (scored as 3); whereas the VAS measure ranges from 0 to 100 where 100 is the best imaginable health state.
To Compare the Change in EQ-5D3L Usual Activities Score From Pre-Op to 1 Year Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 1 year EQ-5D3L is a patient reported standardized instrument used to measure health that comprises of 5 descriptive dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression; and 1 visual analog scale (VAS) that measures health. The descriptive dimensions each have 3 levels: no problems (scored as 1), some problems (scored as 2), and extreme problems (scored as 3); whereas the VAS measure ranges from 0 to 100 where 100 is the best imaginable health state.
To Compare the Change in EQ-5D3L Usual Activities Score From Pre-Op to 5 Years Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 5 years EQ-5D3L is a patient reported standardized instrument used to measure health that comprises of 5 descriptive dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression; and 1 visual analog scale (VAS) that measures health. The descriptive dimensions each have 3 levels: no problems (scored as 1), some problems (scored as 2), and extreme problems (scored as 3); whereas the VAS measure ranges from 0 to 100 where 100 is the best imaginable health state.
To Compare the EQ-5D3L Pain/Discomfort Score Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 2 years EQ-5D3L is a patient reported standardized instrument used to measure health that comprises of 5 descriptive dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression; and 1 visual analog scale (VAS) that measures health. The descriptive dimensions each have 3 levels: no problems (scored as 1), some problems (scored as 2), and extreme problems (scored as 3); whereas the VAS measure ranges from 0 to 100 where 100 is the best imaginable health state.
To Compare the Change in EQ-5D3L Anxiety/Depression Score From Pre-Op to 1 Year Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 1 year EQ-5D3L is a patient reported standardized instrument used to measure health that comprises of 5 descriptive dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression; and 1 visual analog scale (VAS) that measures health. The descriptive dimensions each have 3 levels: no problems (scored as 1), some problems (scored as 2), and extreme problems (scored as 3); whereas the VAS measure ranges from 0 to 100 where 100 is the best imaginable health state.
To Compare the Change in EQ-5D3L VAS Score From Pre-Op to 5 Years Post-Op Between PFC Sigma RP and PFC Sigma RP-F Treatment Groups. 5 years EQ-5D3L is a patient reported standardized instrument used to measure health that comprises of 5 descriptive dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression; and 1 visual analog scale (VAS) that measures health. The descriptive dimensions each have 3 levels: no problems (scored as 1), some problems (scored as 2), and extreme problems (scored as 3); whereas the VAS measure ranges from 0 to 100 where 100 is the best imaginable health state.
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Arrowe Park Hospital
🇬🇧Wirral, Mersyside, United Kingdom
Hospital Clinic i Provincial de Barcelona
🇪🇸Barcelona, Spain