NCT06803537Active, not recruitingNot Applicable
Three-Year Clinical Performance of Fiber-reinforced Versus Indirect Resin Composite Posterior Restorations
Conditions
Interventions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Active, not recruiting
- Sponsor
- Mansoura University
- Enrollment
- 33
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- FDI criteria for evaluation
Study Overview
Brief Summary
This study aimed to perform a comparison between the clinical performance of short fiber-reinforced composite and indirect lab composite restorations in posterior dentition.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 20 Years to 35 Years (Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients aged 20-35 year from both genders.
- •Good oral hygiene: patients with low and moderate caries risk (according to Caries management by caries risk assessment CAMBRA sheets) were enrolled in this study.
- •The visual examination should reveal the presence of a minimum of three primary occlusal or proximal caries (Black Class I and II) with a severity score of 4 or 5 according to the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS).
- •The carious teeth must exhibit vitality and do not display periapical radiolucency as evaluated by periapical radiography.
- •The selected teeth must be under stable occlusion.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Uncontrolled systemic disease
- •Extremely poor oral hygiene
- •Chronic periodontitis
- •Heavy bruxism
- •Cavities with a buccolingual width exceeding two-thirds of the intercuspal distance or requiring cusp covering.
- •Patients undergoing orthodontic procedures.
- •Patients unable to attend the scheduled recall appointments.
Arms & Interventions
Indirect lab composite
Active Comparator
Intervention: Fiber-reinforced composite (Other)
Indirect lab composite
Active Comparator
Intervention: Conventional resin composite (Other)
Conventional microhybrid resin composite
Active Comparator
Intervention: Fiber-reinforced composite (Other)
Conventional microhybrid resin composite
Active Comparator
Intervention: indirect lab composite (Other)
Fiber-reinforced composite
Active Comparator
Intervention: indirect lab composite (Other)
Fiber-reinforced composite
Active Comparator
Intervention: Conventional resin composite (Other)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
FDI criteria for evaluation
Time Frame: Three years follow-up
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
Investigators
Study Sites (1)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Phase 2
restorations in complex cavities of molarsCTRI/2023/10/058233Government Dental College and hospital ,ahmedabad
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
Assessment Of Two Different Types Of Filling Materials On Cavity Present On The Neck Of The ToothCTRI/2024/01/061765JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research
Completed
Not Applicable
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced FRC Base and Bonded CAD/CAM Resin Composite EndocrownsDental CariesNCT06348979Cairo University110
Unknown
Not Applicable
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCTDecay, DentalCaries Class IINCT04720638Cairo University70
Completed
Early Phase 1
Clinical Evaluation of Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Base Versus Incremental Packing of Nanohybrid Resin CompositeCaries Class IINCT04019145Cairo University36