Low-level Laser Therapy With a 635nm Diode Laser on Orthodontic Mini-implants Stability.
- Conditions
- Malocclusion, Angle Class II
- Interventions
- Procedure: Irradiation of implants with 635nm laser
- Registration Number
- NCT04175405
- Lead Sponsor
- Wroclaw Medical University
- Brief Summary
The study aimed to clinically estimate an influence of a 635nm diode laser on the primary and secondary stability of orthodontic mini-implants placed in a maxilla, to assess mini-implants failure rate (mini-implant loss) and to evaluate a pain level after the treatment. The randomized clinical split-mouth trial included 15 subjects, 30 implants (Dual Top Anchor System, Seoul, Korea) with a diameter 1.4mm and length of 10mm. Mini-implants were placed in the area of the attached gingiva between the second premolar and first molar teeth 2 mm below the mucogingival junction of both sides of the maxilla in 20 patients (13 women and 7 men; age: 32.5 ± 6.1 years).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- patients with class II malocclusion defect requiring lateral maxillary teeth distillation based on the use of orthodontic mini-implant;
- the patients were treated first time using fixed orthodontic appliance;
- no systemic diseases;
- were not using anti-inflammatory drugs;
- had used antibiotics in the previous 24 months;
- smokers;
- had history of radiotherapy,
- taking bisphosphonate medication
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Right side of the maxilla Irradiation of implants with 635nm laser The 635-nm laser parameters; dose: 10J per point (20J/cm2), time: 100 sec per point, 2 points (irradiation on a buccal, and a palatal side of the alveolus/implant), the total energy per session 20J.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method stability of orthodontic mini-implants 60 days The mini-implants stability was estimated employing a Periotest device (Medzintechnik Gulden e K, Modautal, Germany). The Periotest measurement system includes the sound formed from contact between an object and a metallic tapping bar in a handpiece, which is electromagnetically driven and electronically verified. The Periotest response detection is analyzed through a fast Fourier transform (FFT) algorithm. Simply put, the Periotest answer to tapping is estimated by an accelerometer and then analyzed. The signal generated by tapping is then transformed to a value called the Periotest value (PTV), which depends on the damping characteristics of the peri-implant tissue. \[27\] The Periotest Test values (PTVs) are based on a numerical scale ranging from -8 to +50, defined by mathematical computation. The lower Periotest values indicate higher implant stability and thereupon the higher absorption effect of the target objects.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain level 24 hours Immediately after the mini-implants placement, each patient received a questionnaire for individual pain assessment (the numeric rating scale, NRS-11, grade level 0-10). The maximum pain level was measured at both sides of the maxilla during the first day after the treatment. The NRS-11 scale consists of a conscious, subjective assessment of the pain experienced; therefore, it is used in the case of patients over ten years old. A rating of 0 signifies no pain, 1-3 represents mild pain, 4-6 moderate pain, and 7-10 severe pain.
mini-implants loss 60 days
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Private Dental Healtcare
🇵🇱Wschowa, Poland