MedPath

Fabrication of a Definitive Cad/Cam Titanium Abutment Prior to Guided Surgery: a Pilot Study.

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Single Edentulous Space
Interventions
Device: abutment margin 0.5 mm subgingival
Device: abutment margin 1.5 mm subgingival
Registration Number
NCT02218541
Lead Sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Brief Summary

The study will involve placing a dental implant through a guided surgery protocol developed using 3D CT technology. Because the implant position is planned digitally using the CT data from the patient, this allows investigation of an abutment that supports the implant crown and soft tissues to be fabricated prior to implant placement. In doing so, this makes the protocol for patient care simpler and faster. In fabricating the the abutment prior to surgery, the investigators will design the abutments at different heights below the gumline to see an optimal margin height for fabrication of the abutment prior to surgery. The study hypothesis is that more often the abutment margin placed just slightly below (.5mm) the gumline will be visible about half of the time while the abutment margin placed further under the gumline (1.5mm) will be visible only about 10% of the time. The optimal outcome is that at delivery and follow-up, the abutment margin will not show intraorally.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
22
Inclusion Criteria
  • partially edentulous with single edentulous space
  • edentulous site where previous tooth has been extracted for at least two months
  • minimum of 20 teeth present
  • able to tolerate dental implant surgical and restorative procedures
  • consent to participate in clinical trial
Exclusion Criteria
  • asa class 3+
  • present drug use
  • is pregnant or plans to become pregnant
  • patients in need of lateral window sinus graft
  • patients in need of grafting prior to implant placement
  • patients in need of extensive grafting at time of implant placement
  • tooth is present or extracted within the last 2 months
  • history of IV bisphosphonate use or oral bisphosphonate use contraindicating dental implant therapy
  • untreated caries or periodontal disease
  • severe bruxism
  • smoker within past 6 months
  • unlikely to be able to comply with study procedures according to investigators
  • known allergy to any materials used in dental implant surgery

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
abutment margin 0.5 mm subgingivalabutment margin 0.5 mm subgingivalwhen fabricating an abutment to support the crown, the margin will be placed 0.5 mm below the gumline
abutment margin 1.5 mm subgingivalabutment margin 1.5 mm subgingivalwhen fabricating the abutment to support the crown, the margin will be placed 1.5 mm below the gumline
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Participants With Abutment Margin Exposure > 0up to 6 months post surgery

Margin exposure of the abutment between groups at 6 months post surgery.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Participants With a Soft Tissue Response of Bleeding6 months post surgery

To assess the condition of the peri-implant mucosa, those with a soft tissue response of bleeding upon probing were counted. Fisher's exact test will be used after the site has been evaluated for presence of bleeding or not.

Number of Participants With Provisional Crown Fit at Delivery8 weeks post surgery

To assess if the Provisional Crown was able to be cemented at time of abutment connection was reported as 'Yes' or 'No.'

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Graduate Prosthodontic Clinic, Dept. of Prosthodontics, UNC School of Dentistry

🇺🇸

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath