MedPath

Direct Resin Composite Restoration of Primary Anterior Teeth Using Custom 3D Printed Templates

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Primary Teeth
Interventions
Other: Direct composite restoration of carious primary anterior teeth using custom 3D printed templates
Other: Direct composite restoration of carious primary anterior teeth using conventional strip crowns
Registration Number
NCT06478004
Lead Sponsor
Minia University
Brief Summary

Esthetic restoration of primary anterior teeth is challenging. Aim of the study: Evaluation of the 12-month clinical performance of direct resin composite restoration of carious vital primary anterior teeth using custom 3D printed templates compared to conventional strip crowns. Subjects and methods: A parallel arms randomized controlled clinical trial was performed in which 98 carious vital primary anterior teeth in 32 children were directly restored with resin composite either with the help of custom 3D printed templates (Group: A) or strip crowns (Group: B). Restorations were assessed for surface luster, anatomical form, material fracture, marginal adaptation, and periodontal response using the revised FDI criteria on three occasions; a week after placement (T0), after six months (T1), and after twelve months (T2). Comparisons between groups were evaluated. A statistically significant level was considered when p value less than or equal 0.05. The tooth was the unit of analysis.

Detailed Description

The present study is a single-center randomized controlled clinical trial with 1:1 allocation ratio. This trial entailed directly restoring carious primary anterior teeth with resin composite either with the help of custom 3D printed templates obtained from digitally waxed-up patients' dental models (Group: A) or conventional strip crowns (Group: B). Restorations were assessed for clinical performance on three occasions; postoperatively (T0), after six months (T1), and after twelve months (T2).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
32
Inclusion Criteria
  • Presence of at least two vital carious primary maxillary incisors.
  • Teeth had at least two carious surfaces requiring complete coronal restoration.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Children with malocclusion or parafunctional oral habits
  • Teeth beyond restoration.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Direct resin composite with the help of custom 3D printed templatesDirect composite restoration of carious primary anterior teeth using custom 3D printed templatesDirectly restoring carious primary anterior teeth with resin composite with the help of custom 3D printed templates obtained from digitally waxed-up patients' dental models.
Direct resin composite using conventional strip crowns.Direct composite restoration of carious primary anterior teeth using conventional strip crownsDirectly restoring carious primary anterior teeth with resin composite using conventional strip crowns.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Surface lusterOn three occasions; a week after placement (T0), at six months (T1), and at twelve months (T2)

Assessment according to the revised clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations of the World Dental Federation (FDI), Each criterion was scored according to a five-step grading of the restoration that was then dichotomized into "acceptable" (for scores 1, 2\&3) and "not acceptable" (for scores 4\&5)

Anatomical formOn three occasions; a week after placement (T0), at six months (T1), and at twelve months (T2)

Assessment according to the revised clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations of the World Dental Federation (FDI), Each criterion was scored according to a five-step grading of the restoration that was then dichotomized into "acceptable" (for scores 1, 2\&3) and "not acceptable" (for scores 4\&5)

Material fractureOn three occasions; a week after placement (T0), at six months (T1), and at twelve months (T2)

Assessment according to the revised clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations of the World Dental Federation (FDI), Each criterion was scored according to a five-step grading of the restoration that was then dichotomized into "acceptable" (for scores 1, 2\&3) and "not acceptable" (for scores 4\&5)

Marginal adaptationOn three occasions; a week after placement (T0), at six months (T1), and at twelve months (T2)

Assessment according to the revised clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations of the World Dental Federation (FDI), Each criterion was scored according to a five-step grading of the restoration that was then dichotomized into "acceptable" (for scores 1, 2\&3) and "not acceptable" (for scores 4\&5)

Periodontal responseOn three occasions; a week after placement (T0), at six months (T1), and at twelve months (T2)

Assessment according to the revised clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations of the World Dental Federation (FDI), Each criterion was scored according to a five-step grading of the restoration that was then dichotomized into "acceptable" (for scores 1, 2\&3) and "not acceptable" (for scores 4\&5)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University

🇪🇬

Minya, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath