MedPath

Assessing the Clinical Efficacy of Bentonite Clay Gel on Bone Regeneration in the Treatment of Intra-bony Defects: A Clinico-radiograph Study

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Bone Regeneration
Interventions
Other: bentonite clay gel with hydroxyapatite
Registration Number
NCT06439264
Lead Sponsor
Dr R Viswa Chandra
Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate osseous regeneration efficacy of bentonite gel with hydroxyapatite in comparison with hydroxyapatite incase of intrabony defects

The test group includes patients with intrabony defects where flap surgery is will be performed and bentonite clay gel with HA will be placed and in control group only HA is placed.

Detailed Description

Experimental: Main treatment group bentonite with hydroxyaatite is added into the defect site.

Comparator: In patients allocated to control group,only hydroxyapatite is added.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
24
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Systemically healthy male and female patients of age >18 years
  2. two-walled or three-walled intrabony defects and
  3. probing pocket depths (PPD) of ≄ 5mm.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Medically compromised patients,
  2. patients <18 years of age,
  3. pregnant women,
  4. heavy smokers, and
  5. patients who underwent radiotherapy or chemotherapy are excluded.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
control groupbentonite clay gel with hydroxyapatiteIn control group, after reflection of flap and degranulation, bone graft i.e., hydroxyapatite will be placed in the defect and sutures will be placed.
test groupbentonite clay gel with hydroxyapatiteIn test group, after reflection of flap and degranulation, bone graft i.e., bentonite clay gel with hydroxyapatite will be placed in the void created by the defect and sutures will be placed
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
RVGbaseline , 3months,6months

1. Radiovisiography will be used to assess bone regeneration achieved post operatively after 3 months and 6 months.

clinical attachment levelbaseline , 3months,6months

Assessment of clinical attachment level using probe at baseline and post operatively at 3 and 6 months.

probing depthbaseline , 3months,6months

2. Assessment of probing depth using probe at baseline and postoperatively at 3 and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
1. Assessment of plaque - according to Turesky modification of Quigley and Hein Plaque Index, 1970. 2. Assessment of Gingivitis - according to Loe H and Silness P, 1963.baseline ,3months,6months

1. Assessment of plaque - according to Turesky modification of Quigley and Hein Plaque Index, 1970.

2. Assessment of Gingivitis - according to Loe H and Silness P, 1963.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Svs Dental College

🇼🇳

Mahbƫbnagar, Telangana, India

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath