The Effect of Enamel Matrix Derivatives on Root Coverage Esthetic Score
- Conditions
- Gingival RecessionPeriodontal Diseases
- Registration Number
- NCT03197610
- Lead Sponsor
- Yuzuncu Yıl University
- Brief Summary
Subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTG) are accepted as the gold standard in covering denuded root surfaces. Combining enamel matrix derivatives (EMD) with periodontoplasic surgical operations is another method in covering denuded root surface. The aim of this study is to compare a SCTG operation group and EMD applied group in addition to SCTG using complete root coverage rate and a newer method root coverage esthetic scoring system (RES).
- Detailed Description
Background: Subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTG) are accepted as the gold standard in covering denuded root surfaces. Combining enamel matrix derivatives (EMD) with periodontoplasic surgical operations is another method in covering denuded root surface. The aim of this study is to compare a SCTG operation group and EMD applied group in addition to SCTG using complete root coverage rate and a newer method root coverage esthetic scoring system (RES).
Methods: This is a split-mouth and controlled study. Thirthy-eight Class I or II gingival recession defects at canine teeth were treated in the control (SCTG) (n=19) and test groups (n=19) (SCTG+EMD). The root coverage esthetic score were evaluated by 2 blind periodontists 1 year after the treatment using RES. The agreement between the two periodontists was assessed by kappa analysis. Complete root coverage rate was evaluated for both groups. Two groups were compared with statistically methods in terms of RES parameters and gingival recession height /width.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 19
- The patient had no systemic disease, did not smoke cigarette and tobacco products, did not have a pregnancy and breastfeeding period, had class I and class II gingival recession according to the Miller gingival classification, had a recession depth of ≥2 mm, have not had a restoration and have had an operation in the relevant dental region that had no previous gingival surgical procedure were included in this study.
- systemic disease
- multiple gingival recession
- miller class III and IV recessions were excluded
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method root coverage percentage 1 year root coverage percentage of denuded root surface
root coverage aesthetic score 1 year root coverage aesthetic score of treatment modalities
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method