Comparative evaluation of root coverage using subepithelial connective tissue and de-epithelized pericoronal flap autograft-a randomized control study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 3 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 12
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To compare the treatment outcome following sub epithelial connective tissue and de-epithelized pericoronal flap.
研究概览
简要总结
End point of periodontal therapy is to regenerate tooth supporting structures that have been lost. In this study main aim is to regenerate soft tissue using subepithelial connective tissue graft and operculum as autografts in root coverage.
Gingival recession refers to the apical displacement of the marginal gingiva from its usual location on the tooth crown to a position along the root surface, extending beyond the cementoenamel junction.
Causes for gingival attachment loss are poor oral hygiene subgingival calculus, improper brushing technique, high frenal attachment, improperly designed partial dentures, improper restoration, chemicals, some pathological conditions
Auto graft is a tissue taken from the same person.it is more reliable And chances of infection and rejection are less. Both subepithelial connective tissue and de-epithelized pericoronal flap have good outcomes in root coverage, double blood supply is created, greater marginal thickness can be obtained.
This study evaluates and compare the clinical outcomes of root coverage and gingival marginal thickness. which will be evidence based guidance for clinicians to select suitable technique.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Other
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 45.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •(1) Patients with good general health, (2) Patients who were nonsmokers, (3) Patients having no history of any medication affecting periodontal healing.
- •(4) Patients with single tooth RT1 gingival recession (5) Patients with erupting third molar having adequate operculum for single tooth RT1recession.
排除标准
- •History of systemic diseases, (2) Pregnant or lactating patients, (3) Inadequate oral hygiene after Phase I therapy, (4) Allergic to any medication, and (5) Patients with thin palatal connective tissue.
结局指标
主要结局
To compare the treatment outcome following sub epithelial connective tissue and de-epithelized pericoronal flap.
时间窗: 1st month | 2nd month | 3rd month
次要结局
- To evaluate the gingival recession depth, width of keratinized gingiva, clinical attachment level, attached gingiva & percentage of root coverage following root coverage using sub epithelial connective tissue graft.(To evaluate the gingival recession depth, width of keratinized gingiva, clinical attachment level, attached gingiva & percentage of root coverage following root coverage using de-epithelized pericoronal flap.)
研究者
Dr Aishwarya
KVG Dental College and Hospital