Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05252312
NCT05252312RecruitingNot Applicable

Perception of Nonverbal Acoustic Signals and Resulting Physiological Responses SINOVE-PER

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne1 site in 1 country2,000 target enrollmentStarted: November 29, 2022Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Enrollment
2,000
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Numerical values of judgements along a scale

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Like many other animals, humans produce nonverbal signals including screams, grunts, roars, cries and laughter across a variety of contexts.Due to their acoustic structure, nonverbal vocalizations and valanced speech (e.g., yelling) are also likely to elicit predictable physiological, perceptual or behavioural responses in the receiver of the signal (the listener). This is critical if researchers are to gain a comprehensive understanding of the broad range of mechanisms and the evolved functions of acoustic communication.

Therefore, in this research, investigators will examine specifically how exposure to vocal stimuli affects both the cognitive and biological responses of the listener.

Detailed Description

Like many other animals, humans produce nonverbal signals including screams, grunts, roars, cries and laughter across a variety of contexts. Many of these signals (such as cries) are already produced at birth and are likely to serve a number of important biological and social functions. In addition, human speech is characterized by nonlinguistic acoustic parameters (such as pitch, formant frequencies, and nonlinear phenomena) that are known to correlate with biologically important traits of the vocalizer.

Due to their acoustic structure, nonverbal vocalizations and valanced speech (e.g., yelling) are also likely to elicit predictable physiological, perceptual or behavioural responses in the receiver of the signal (the listener).

However, while a number of playback studies have examined behavioural responses (e.g., ratings) of listeners when exposed to various voice stimuli, very few studies have examined whether such behavioural responses are accompanied by an underlying physiological response. This is critical if researchers are to gain a comprehensive understanding of the broad range of mechanisms and the evolved functions of acoustic communication.

Therefore, in this research, investigators will examine specifically how exposure to vocal stimuli affects both the cognitive and biological responses of the listener.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Other
Time Perspective
Prospective

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •- Participant should be affiliated or entitled to a social security scheme

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Pregnancy
  • •Hearing impairment, speech production disorders or major health problems.

Arms & Interventions

Healthy adult population aged 18 to 80 years

After listening to acoustic stimuli, participants will be asked to judge these stimuli on relevant evaluation criteria (e.g., "how distressed does this person sound?").

Intervention: Psycho-acoustic tests (Behavioral)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Numerical values of judgements along a scale

Time Frame: Immediately after the vocal stimuli

Participants will be asked to judge vocal stimuli Example : participants may be asked to judge, along a gradient (from 0 to 100), "how consistent the distress of the baby you heard is to you".

Proportion of correct responses in a forced-choice task after vocal stimuli

Time Frame: Immediately after the vocal stimuli

Participants will be asked to judge vocal stimuli Example : "Of the two baby cries you listened to, which one do you think shows the most distress"

Response time (second)

Time Frame: Immediately after the vocal stimuli

Participants will be asked to judge vocal stimuli In this case, the participant is instructed to respond as soon as possible. The response time for each stimulus is then systematically measured

Secondary Outcomes

  • Skin temperature (°C)(During the vocal stimuli)
  • Heart rate (bpm)(During the vocal stimuli)
  • Skin conductance (Siemens)(During the vocal stimuli)
  • Nociception Level Index (NOL)(During the vocal stimuli)
  • Pupillary diameter (millimeter)(During the vocal stimuli)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials