Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04482218
NCT04482218CompletedNot Applicable

Comparison Between the Old Diagnostic Tools for Paediatric Undernutrition and the New HAS 2019 Recommendations

University Hospital, Montpellier1 site in 1 country100 target enrollmentStarted: July 17, 2020Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
100
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Comparison between HAS 2019 undernutrition criteria and previous diagnostic methodology

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Undernutrition is a widely under-diagnosed public health problem, including in pediatrics department. Undernutrition prevalence in pediatrics departments is about 15 to 20%.

Until now, there has been no national consensus on the criteria to be used to diagnose paediatric undernutrition. Until now, assessment focused on a range of non-consensus arguments that allowed the health care team to make its diagnosis. So, in the absence of well-defined criteria, diagnosis was based in part on experience and assesment team.

Since November 2019, the French High Authority of Health (Haute Authorité de Santé - HAS) has suggested recommendations to standardize pediatric undernutrition diagnosis.

The investigators offer to evaluate undernutrition prevalence differences diagnosed according to new HAS criteria compared to the previous diagnostic methodology.

The investigator's secondary aim is to identify profiles of children who do match between the two diagnostics methods.

Detailed Description

The investigators will conduct a prospective cohort without change in care.

Following classic patient admission in involved departments, the investigating team moves to the department to collect data.

The measurements and informations collected are no different from those taken in the context of normal care.

All anthropometric measurements correspond to recommendations of good practice. Anthropometric measurements will be carried out by the healthcare team.

With collected data the investigators will evaluate undernutrition for each child, according to the 2 diagnostics methods.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Cohort
Time Perspective
Prospective

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
0 Years to 18 Years (Child, Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Comparison between HAS 2019 undernutrition criteria and previous diagnostic methodology

Time Frame: 2 month

Comparison between HAS 2019 undernutrition criteria and previous diagnostic methodology

Secondary Outcomes

  • Identified profiles of children who do match between the two diagnostics methods(2 month)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Comparison Between the Old Diagnostic... | Clinical Trial