The Efficacy of Hemostatic Powder TC-325 Versus Standard Endoscopic Treatment for Gastrointestinal Bleeding From Malignancy; a Multi-center Randomized Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 进行中（未招募）
- 入组人数
- 112
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- To evaluate the efficacy of TC-325 in preventing 30-day rebleeding following the index malignant hemorrhage: Rebleeding rate
研究概览
简要总结
Title: The efficacy of hemostatic powder TC-325 versus standard endoscopic treatment for gastrointestinal bleeding from malignancy; a multi-center randomized trial
Background: Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding arising from malignant tumors is increasingly recognized as a result of oncological advances and improved detection methods. However, conventional endoscopic hemostatic methods are not reliable to control bleeding. It has a trend to be an effective hemostasis method for active GI bleeding from tumor, however, in view of the lack of RCTs and large-scale studies, the efficacy of TC-325 is still inconclusive.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of TC325 in endoscopic hemostasis treatment for malignant gastrointestinal hemorrhage.The 24-hour, 72-hour, 30-day, 90-day and 180-day rebleeding rate were assessed as the outcomes of treatment as well as 6-month mortality.
Study design: Single-blinded, multi-center, randomized-control trial study The intervention (experimental) arm: TC-325 alone (define failure if continued bleeding despite application of 1 syringes) The control arm: Standard of (traditional) endoscopic treatments
** Crossover is possible. Inclusion criteria: Patients with acute upper or lower GIB from a lesion that is actively bleeding at index endoscopy (spurting or oozing) and is suspected to be malignant or diagnosed as malignancy from previous tissue diagnosis.
Exclusion criteria: Patients less than 18 years old, previously included in the trial, ECOG score 3 or 4, pregnancy/lactation, and/or bleeding from GI sources suspected of not being malignant. If an endoscopist is unsure of the malignant likelihood of the lesion, he/she will not be enrolled.
Sample size: 112 in total
Duration of participation for each volunteer: 180 days
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
盲法说明
Due to the nature of the intervention and control arms, blinding of the endoscopist is not possible (visual clues as to the nature of endoscopic treatment are evident and no sham procedure can be delivered since both are active treatment groups). However, in order to minimize possible patient/observer bias, any research team member or investigator assessing the patient after the initial endoscopy and involved in data collection or analysis, as well as the patient, and research nurse will be blinded to treatment allocation.
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Acute upper or lower gastrointestinal bleeding
- •Endoscopy shows actively bleeding at index endoscopy (spurting or oozing)
- •Bleeding from malignancy
排除标准
- •Less than 18 years old
- •Previously included in the trial
- •Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score 3 or 4
- •Pregnancy/lactation
- •Bleeding from GI sources suspected of not being malignant
结局指标
主要结局
To evaluate the efficacy of TC-325 in preventing 30-day rebleeding following the index malignant hemorrhage: Rebleeding rate
时间窗: 30 days
Rebleeding rate
次要结局
- 1. To evaluate the efficacy of TC-325 in immediate hemostasis and rebleeding at 24 hours, 72 hours, 90 days and 180 days following presentation at initial bleeding episode as well as 6-month survival rate(180 days)
研究者
Rapat Pittayanon
Principle investigator, Gastrointestinal Unit
King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital