Artificial Urinary Sphincter Clinical Outcomes
- Conditions
- Stress Urinary Incontinence
- Registration Number
- NCT04088331
- Lead Sponsor
- Boston Scientific Corporation
- Brief Summary
To evaluate the AMS 800 Artificial Urinary Sphincter (AUS) in men with primary stress urinary incontinence as measured by pad weight tests.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Male
- Target Recruitment
- 145
- Male
- ≥ 18 years of age
- Has undergone either a radical prostatectomy, transurethral resection of the prostate or other invasive prostate surgery
- Demonstrates primary stress urinary incontinence
- Positive screening 24-hour pad weight test (≥100 grams)
- Experiences at least 3 incontinence episodes per day during baseline diary or presents with continuous incontinence
- Negative urine culture
- Willing and able to undergo surgical implantation of the AUS device
- Willing and able to comply with the follow-up requirements
- Willing and able to forego any other surgical urinary incontinence treatments while participating in the study
- Willing and able to sign the informed consent
- Previously had or currently has a device implanted (AUS/Sling, or otherwise) for treatment of SUI or urge incontinence
- Primary urgency incontinence
- Postvoid residual volume greater that 150 ml or a history of difficulty emptying the bladder
- Recurrent vesicourethral anastomotic stricture or urethral stricture disease within the past 6 months
- Known urogenital malignancy other than previously treated prostate cancer
- Recurrent prostate cancer that is expected to require intervention during the study follow-up period
- History of recurrent bladder stones within the past 12 months prior to signing the informed consent
- Neurogenic bladder
- Need for intermittent catheterization
- Known history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
- Immunosuppressed or on medical therapy which would impact the immune system
- Uncontrolled diabetes, defined as (HbA1c>10)
- Has a genitourinary mechanical prosthesis that was implanted within 3 months from the date of consent
- Had a post-implantation infection associated with the device after genitourinary mechanical prosthesis was implanted
- Undergone bulking procedure within 6 months of the baseline assessment
- Poor candidate for surgical procedures and/or anesthesia due to physical or mental conditions
- Urinary incontinence due to or complicated by an irreversibly obstructed lower urinary tract
- Irresolvable detrusor hyperreflexia or bladder instability
- Currently enrolled or plans to enroll in another device or drug clinical trial
- Currently using an indwelling catheter or condom catheter for treatment of incontinence and is not willing to discontinue use at least 4 weeks prior to baseline assessment
- Known allergy or sensitivity to rifampin or to minocycline HCl or other tetracyclines (only applicable when implanting with InhibiZone version of this device)
- Systemic lupus erythematosus because minocycline HCl has been reported to aggravate this condition (only applicable when implanting with InhibiZone version of this device)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Subjects With Reduction in 24 Hour Pad Weight Test at 12 Months 12 months Number of subjects achieving 50% reduction or greater in baseline urinary incontinence as measured by 24-hour pad weight test at 12 months post device activation
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Participants That Required Revision (Revision Rates), Had Serious Adverse Events, and Had Serious Adverse Events That Are Device and/or Procedure Related 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months Percentage of Participants that Required Revision (Revision Rates), had Serious Adverse Events, and had Serious Adverse Events that are Device and/or Procedure Related at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Adverse event and revision rates are summarized by the Kaplan-Meier estimate with revision/event timing relative to the index procedure.
Number of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Reduction in 24 Hour Pad Weight Test at Device Activation Device Activation Number of subjects achieving ≥ 50% reduction in urinary incontinence as measured by 24-hour pad weight test at device activation compared to baseline
Number of Subjects Achieving ≥ 75% Reduction in 24 Hour Pad Weight Test at Device Activation Device Activation ≥ 75% reduction in urinary incontinence as measured by 24-hour pad weight test at device activation compared to baseline
Change in Number of Pads Per Day at 6 Months 6 months Change in number of pads per day at 6 months post-device activation compared to baseline. Change was calculated by subtracting the number of pads per day at baseline from the number of pads per day at 6 months.
Change in Number of Pads Per Day at 3 Months 3 months Change in number of pads per day at 3 months compared to baseline. Change was calculated by subtracting the number of pads per day at baseline from the number of pads per day at 3 months.
Number of Subjects Achieving ≥ 75% Reduction in 24 Hour Pad Weight Test at 6 Months 6 months ≥ 75% reduction in urinary incontinence as measured by 24-hour pad weight test at 6 months post device activation compared to baseline
Number of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Reduction in 24 Hour Pad Weight Test at 6 Months 6 months Number of subjects achieving ≥ 50% reduction in urinary incontinence as measured by 24-hour pad weight test at 6 months post device activation compared to baseline
Number of Subjects Achieving ≥ 75% Reduction in 24 Hour Pad Weight Test at 12 Months 12 months ≥ 75% reduction in urinary incontinence as measured by 24-hour pad weight test at 12 months post device activation compared to baseline
Change in Number of Pads Per Day at 12 Months 12 months Change in number of pads per day at 12 months post-device activation compared to baseline. Change was calculated by subtracting the number of pads per day at baseline from the number of pads per day at 12 months.
Trial Locations
- Locations (18)
University of California, San Francisco
🇺🇸San Francisco, California, United States
University of Colorado Hospital
🇺🇸Aurora, Colorado, United States
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
🇺🇸Iowa City, Iowa, United States
University of Kansas Hospital
🇺🇸Kansas City, Kansas, United States
Willis-Knighton Bossier Medical Center
🇺🇸Bossier City, Louisiana, United States
Johns Hopkins Hospital
🇺🇸Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Lahey Clinic Hospital
🇺🇸Burlington, Massachusetts, United States
University of Minnesota Medical Center
🇺🇸Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Duke University Medical Center
🇺🇸Durham, North Carolina, United States
Wake Forest University School of Medicine
🇺🇸Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Scroll for more (8 remaining)University of California, San Francisco🇺🇸San Francisco, California, United States