MedPath

Plasmafit® Revision Structan® Hip Endoprosthesis Cup

Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Instability of Prosthetic Joint
Prosthesis Failure
Fractures, Hip
Osteolysis
Femoral Head Avascular Necrosis
Arthroplasty Complications
Degenerative Osteoarthritis
Rheumatic Arthritis
Interventions
Device: Plasmafit® Revision Structan®
Registration Number
NCT04255966
Lead Sponsor
Aesculap AG
Brief Summary

The aim of this observational study is to collect clinical and radiological results of the new Plasmafit® Revision Structan® Hip Endoprosthesis Cup in a standard patient population and when used in routine clinical practice.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Plasmafit® Revision Structan®Plasmafit® Revision Structan®Plasmafit® Revision Structan® Hip Endoprosthesis Cup
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Harris Hip Score (Functional results of the operated hip) over timeup to five years postoperatively

The functional results of the operated hip will be assessed with the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and evaluated over time

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Survival of the implantup to five years postoperatively

Any removal or exchange of the acetabular cup or the polyethylene inlay is defined as revision.

A removal of the stem is not evaluated as acetabular revision but will be documented and evaluated as part of postoperative complications.

The revision-free survival will be assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Radiological Assessment: Osseointegration of the cup over timeat 3 months, 24 months, 5 years follow-up

The acetabular component in AP view is divided into the three regions I-III as defined by DeLee-Charnley. All three regions will be assessed for osteolysis the implant, to allow an estimation of the osseous integration and stability of the implant.

ImpingementIntraoperative

The incidence of impingement during intraoperative mobilization is documented;

Complicationsup to 5 years postoperatively

All complications in the postoperative course are recorded

Technical problems during surgeryIntraoperative

Technical problems with instruments, implants or containers, instrument related issues

Quality of Life over timeup to five years postoperatively

EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), each of which can take one of three responses reflecting severity (no problems/some or moderate problems/extreme problems).

Radiological assessment: Radiographic loosening of the cup over timeat 3 months, 24 months, 5 years follow-up

The acetabular component in AP view is divided into the three regions I-III as defined by DeLee-Charnley. All three regions will be assessed for and radiolucent lines around the implant, to allow an estimation of the osseous integration and stability of the implant.

General handling of instruments / containersIntraoperative

Complaints or problems with the handling of instruments, implants or containers, instrument related issues

Trial Locations

Locations (4)

Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes

🇩🇪

Homburg, Saarland, Germany

Orthopädische Klinik König-Ludwig-Haus

🇩🇪

Würzburg, Bayern, Germany

Herzogin Elisabeth Hospital

🇩🇪

Braunschweig, Niedersachse, Germany

Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Bonn

🇩🇪

Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath