Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03269864
NCT03269864
Unknown
Not Applicable

Use of Perforator Flaps for Leg and Foot Reconstruction

Assiut University0 sites40 target enrollmentSeptember 5, 2017

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Post Traumatic Skin Defect in Leg and Foot
Sponsor
Assiut University
Enrollment
40
Primary Endpoint
Assessment of the perforator flap
Last Updated
8 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Perforator vessels are those where the source artery is deep and the branch that carries blood to the fasciocutaneous tissues passes through the overlying deep fascia.

Soft tissue defects in the lower extremity, especially distal third of leg, present a challenge to reconstructive surgeons due to lack of reliable local flaps, conventional reconstructive options include split skin grafting, local random fasciocutaneous flaps, cross leg fasciocutaneous flap, pedicled muscular or musculocutaneous flaps or microvascular free tissue transfer. All these procedures have their limitations and associated morbidity at donor site

Detailed Description

Taylor and Palmer defined an angiosome as a three-dimensional vascular territory supplied by a source artery and vein through branches for all tissue layers between the skin and the bone, and showed that between neighboring angiosomes there are choked and true anastomotic arteries. Koshima and Soeda in 1989, described an inferior epigastric artery skin flap without the rectus abdominis muscle for reconstruction of floor of mouth, began the era of perforator flaps. The big popularity gained by the local perforator flaps was due to their main advantages: 1) Sparing of the source artery and underlying muscle and fascia, 2) Combining the very good blood supply of a musculocutaneous flap with the reduced donor-site morbidity of a skin flap, 3) Replacing like with like, 4) Limiting the donor-site to the same area, 5) Possibility of completely or partially primarily closure, 6) Technically less demanding, because they are microsurgical procedures, but without microvascular sutures, 7) Shorter operating time.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 5, 2017
End Date
August 1, 2019
Last Updated
8 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Mohamed Adel

Principal investigator

Assiut University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Traumatic soft tissue defects on foot and leg.
  • Simple defects i.e., soft tissue loss, with or without, tendon injury.
  • Patients from 6 years to 60 years old

Exclusion Criteria

  • Other causes of soft tissue defects e.g. (Diabetic, Vascular, post malignant resection).
  • Complex defects (soft tissue with bone injury).
  • Patients below 6 years or above 60 years old.
  • Patients with debilitating diseases e.g chronic renal failure, diabetes mellitus....etc.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Assessment of the perforator flap

Time Frame: This will be assessed in the first week postoperative

The perforator flap will be assessed regarding (color, temperature, capillary refilling, congestion, blistering).

Similar Trials