MedPath

Impact of the Use of Remote Monitoring in the Follow-up of the Renal Transplant Patient.

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Renal Transplantation
Interventions
Other: traditional schedule
Other: Ap'Telecare
Registration Number
NCT03750331
Lead Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
Brief Summary

Transplant Centers are facing new organisational challenges with regards to the growing number of patients they have to follow-up. We have developed and assessed the feasibility of using a novel web application permitting a medically-tailored follow-up of stable renal transplanted outpatients: Ap'TELECARE. This novel approach is likely to facilitate the organization of patients' follow-up at the Transplant Centre level as well as to provide secondary individual benefits in terms of therapeutic education, adherence to treatment and eventually to improve long term outcome.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
738
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients transplanted for at least 3 months
  • Stable renal graft function
Exclusion Criteria
  • No home internet access
  • Major disability

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
traditional patient follow-uptraditional schedulea group of renal transplant outpatients consulting their Transplant Centre following a traditional schedule (every other week up to 6 months post-transplant, once a month up to year 1, every three months up to year 2 and every 6 months thereafter)
medically-tailored follow-up with Ap'TelecareAp'Telecarea group of patients assisted by Ap'Telecare and consulting their Transplant Centre following a less stringent schedule of consultations (every month up to 6 months, every other month up to year 1, every six months up to year 2 and once a year thereafter).
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Patients experiencing at least one episode of graft dysfunction2 years

graft dysfunction defined by a drop of at least 20% of their usual estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) value)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Post-transplant complication2 years
Evaluation criteria for the Budget Impact Analysis2 years

Average cost saved per 100 patients treated in the "Ap'Telecare group" compared to the "traditional follow-up".

Quality of life assessed2 years

EuroQol group - 5 Dimensions ( EQ-5D) scale

Level of anxiety and depression2 years

Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale

Death2 years
Failure of immunosuppressive treatment2 years

Detection of donor-specific anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) antibodies by LUMINEX technic

number of patients who needed to return to dialysis2 years
number of patients with acute or chronic transplant rejection2 years
Incremental cost-effectiveness evaluation criteria2 years

Cost per QALY earned (QALYs estimated from the EuroQol group - 5 Dimensions ( EQ-5D) quality of life scale).

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

CHU Saint-Etienne

🇫🇷

Saint-Étienne, France

Clermont-Ferrand, CHU Site Gabriel-Montpied

🇫🇷

Clermont-Ferrand, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath