Impact of the Use of Remote Monitoring in the Follow-up of the Renal Transplant Patient.
- Conditions
- Renal Transplantation
- Interventions
- Other: traditional scheduleOther: Ap'Telecare
- Registration Number
- NCT03750331
- Brief Summary
Transplant Centers are facing new organisational challenges with regards to the growing number of patients they have to follow-up. We have developed and assessed the feasibility of using a novel web application permitting a medically-tailored follow-up of stable renal transplanted outpatients: Ap'TELECARE. This novel approach is likely to facilitate the organization of patients' follow-up at the Transplant Centre level as well as to provide secondary individual benefits in terms of therapeutic education, adherence to treatment and eventually to improve long term outcome.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 738
- Patients transplanted for at least 3 months
- Stable renal graft function
- No home internet access
- Major disability
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description traditional patient follow-up traditional schedule a group of renal transplant outpatients consulting their Transplant Centre following a traditional schedule (every other week up to 6 months post-transplant, once a month up to year 1, every three months up to year 2 and every 6 months thereafter) medically-tailored follow-up with Ap'Telecare Ap'Telecare a group of patients assisted by Ap'Telecare and consulting their Transplant Centre following a less stringent schedule of consultations (every month up to 6 months, every other month up to year 1, every six months up to year 2 and once a year thereafter).
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Patients experiencing at least one episode of graft dysfunction 2 years graft dysfunction defined by a drop of at least 20% of their usual estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) value)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Post-transplant complication 2 years Evaluation criteria for the Budget Impact Analysis 2 years Average cost saved per 100 patients treated in the "Ap'Telecare group" compared to the "traditional follow-up".
Quality of life assessed 2 years EuroQol group - 5 Dimensions ( EQ-5D) scale
Level of anxiety and depression 2 years Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale
Death 2 years Failure of immunosuppressive treatment 2 years Detection of donor-specific anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) antibodies by LUMINEX technic
number of patients who needed to return to dialysis 2 years number of patients with acute or chronic transplant rejection 2 years Incremental cost-effectiveness evaluation criteria 2 years Cost per QALY earned (QALYs estimated from the EuroQol group - 5 Dimensions ( EQ-5D) quality of life scale).
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
CHU Saint-Etienne
🇫🇷Saint-Étienne, France
Clermont-Ferrand, CHU Site Gabriel-Montpied
🇫🇷Clermont-Ferrand, France