跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01475487
NCT01475487已完成不适用

A Comparison of Ultrasound Versus Digital Palpation Guided Cricothyrotomy in Subjects With Poorly Defined Anatomical Landmarks

Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital0 个研究点目标入组 47 人开始时间: 2011年4月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
47
主要终点
The Primary Outcome Measure Was the Complication Rate Asssed as the Number of Participants Causing Injuries

研究概览

简要总结

Inability to provide oxygen to the patient remains the most fearful anesthesia-related mishap. Cricothyrotomy (CT) is an infrequently performed but life saving procedure for an anesthesiologist, who is encountered with this situation. The current method of cricothyrotomy relies on digital palpation (DP). Several patient populations, including morbidly obese, short neck, radiation to and previous neck surgeries, have difficult landmarks for this procedure. Ultrasound (US) technology has been used in the past to visualize landmarks for cricothyrotomy, but there is no study which has examined the role of ultrasound in patients who have obscure landmarks. There is no data related to the performance of ultrasound guided cricothyrotomy in these patients. In this study, we aimed to determine the outcomes of CT performed on human cadavers using US-guidance, compared to conventional DP, of anatomical landmarks. In particularly, complication rates, failure to cannulate, correct placement of the device and insertion time of CT were assessed.

详细描述

For each cadaver - epidemiological data (age, sex) and morphometric data (Body Mass Index, neck circumference, thyromental distance)

The primary outcome measure was the complication rate as assessed by the severity of injuries; defined as the incidence and severity of posterior laryngeal and tracheal wall injuries, as graded by two anesthesiologists using the grading system described by Murphy et al,( none (no injury); mild (< 5 mm laceration); moderate (> 5mm laceration or partial puncture); severe (> 10 mm laceration or full puncture)). For clinical relevance and analysis of data we dichotomized the scale to none-mild and moderate - severe injuries.

The secondary outcomes include: 1) insertion time, measured in seconds (s) from the time of palpation of the skin to insertion of the Portex device in the trachea; 2) failure, with a 'failure' defined as any attempt in which the trachea was not cannulated, or which required > 300 s to perform; and 3) correct land-marking, defined as having the Portex device inserted via the CM.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Residents who are novice to the application of ultrasound in difficult airway scenarios
  • Cadavers with difficult and imposible landmarks identification

排除标准

  • Anethesiologist with previous experience in CT, manual or ultrasound assisted
  • Patients with easily identifiable landmarks

结局指标

主要结局

The Primary Outcome Measure Was the Complication Rate Asssed as the Number of Participants Causing Injuries

时间窗: On avergae less than 300 seconds

The primary outcome measure was the complication rate as assessed by the severity of injuries; defined as the incidence and severity of posterior laryngeal and tracheal wall injuries, as graded by two anesthesiologists using the grading system described by Murphy et al,( none (no injury); mild (\< 5 mm laceration); moderate (\> 5mm laceration or partial puncture); severe (\> 10 mm laceration or full puncture)).

次要结局

  • Number of Attempts(not more than 300 seconds)
  • Correct Landmarking(less than 300 seconds)
  • Insertion Time(less than 5 minutes from starting of procedure)

研究者

发起方
Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr. Naveed Siddiqui

Assistant Professor

Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital

相似试验