MedPath

Sequential vs. Standard Laser Treatment of Twin-twin Transfusion Syndrome

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Twin Twin Transfusion Syndrome
Interventions
Procedure: Sequential laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels.
Procedure: Selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels
Registration Number
NCT02122328
Lead Sponsor
University of Southern California
Brief Summary

The investigators hypothesize that treatment of twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) using sequential laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels (SQLPCV) over the predominant method, selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels (SLPCV), may provide vascular stability to the donor fetus. The primary objective is to evaluate the perinatal outcome, specifically, donor intrauterine survival of TTTS managed by SQLPCV vs. SLPCV in a prospective, randomized trial.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
642
Inclusion Criteria
  • Gestational age: 16 weeks, 0 days to 26 weeks, 0 days.

  • Confirmed TTTS patients, who by definition meet the following sonographic criteria:

    • Single placenta.
    • Polyhydramnios: maximum vertical pocket ≥ 8 cm in the recipient twin, prior to amniodrainage.
    • Oligohydramnios: maximum vertical pocket ≤ 2 cm in the donor twin, prior to amniodrainage.
    • Thin dividing membrane (absence of twin peak sign) or absence of dividing membrane (monoamniotic).
    • Same gender, if visible.
    • Quintero Stages 1-4.
  • Patients choosing laser therapy that have undergone prior therapeutic amniocentesis may be included.

  • Patients with an anterior placenta may be included.

  • Triplet gestations with two or three fetuses sharing the same placenta may be included.

  • Patients must be able to give written informed consent.

Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients unable or unwilling to participate in the study or to be followed up.
  • Patients unable to give written informed consent.
  • Presence of major congenital anomalies that may not warrant surgery.
  • Known unbalanced chromosomal complement.
  • Prior intentional septostomy (purposely making a hole in the dividing membrane).
  • Ruptured membranes.
  • Chorioamnionitis.
  • Abnormal intracranial ultrasound findings of either fetus to include, but not limited to: intraventricular hemorrhage, porencephalic cysts, hydrocephalus, Dandy-Walker syndrome, holoprosencephaly and agenesis of the corpus callosum. Isolated ventriculomegaly (atrium 10-19 mm) may or may not be used as exclusion criteria.
  • Placental abruption.
  • Active labor.
  • Patient unwilling to receive blood products.
  • Recipient twin with a middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity > 1.5 multiples of the median (indicative of fetal anemia).
  • Any other patient deemed inappropriate for the study by the principal investigator.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Sequential procedureSequential laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels.Sequential laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels
Selective procedureSelective laser photocoagulation of communicating vesselsSelective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To compare donor intrauterine survival (alive at birth) for those undergoing SQLPCV vs. SLPCV.Birth

A comparison of donor survival at birth will be made between subjects assigned to the sequential (SQLPCV) procedure versus those assigned to the selective (SLPCV) procedure.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Surgical complications21 post-operative days

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center

🇺🇸

Los Angeles, California, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath