MedPath

Quantitative US for Evaluation of Hepatic Steatosis in NAFLD

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Fatty Liver, Nonalcoholic
Fatty Liver
Interventions
Diagnostic Test: Quantitative US (Samsung Medison, RS85A)
Registration Number
NCT04462562
Lead Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate diagnostic performance of quantitative ultrasonographic parameters for the assessment of hepatic steatosis with find optimal cut-off values in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease using magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) and MR spectroscopy as the reference standard.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
173
Inclusion Criteria
  • patients with known NAFLD or suspected of having NAFLD
  • Patients who are scheduled hepatectomy for living donor liver donation
  • aged ≥ 18 years who are willing and able to complete all procedures
Exclusion Criteria
  • excessive alcohol consumption within 2 years (40g/day for men, 20g/day for women)
  • clinical, laboratory, or histologic evidence of a liver disease other than NAFLD, including viral hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, or genetic or acquired disorders
  • use of steatogenic or hepatotoxic medication
  • evidence of decompensated liver disease
  • history of liver surgery
  • contraindication to MRI
  • any other condition believed by investigator to affect a patients' compliance, or completion of the study

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
quantitative ultrasound imaging parametersQuantitative US (Samsung Medison, RS85A)quantitative ultrasound imaging parameters * tissue attenuation imaging (TAI) parameter * tissue scatter-distribution imaging (TSI) parameter * Hepatorenal index (semi-auto, EzHRI)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Diagnostic performance (area under the ROC curve (AUC)) of quantitative US (QUS) parameters (TAI, TSI) for detection of fatty liver (MRI-PDFF 5 percent)1 month

Reference standard: MRI-proton density fat fraction or MR spectroscopy value (5 percent)

- ROC curve analysis of each QUS parameters (TAI, TSI, EzHRI) for the detection of MRI-PDFF \>5 percent patients

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Correlation of QUS parameters and MR fat fraction1 month

reference standard: MRI-PDFF or MR spectroscopy value (percent)

- spearman's rank correlation of QUS parameters (TAI, TSI) values with MR fat fraction(percent)

Correlation between estimated fat fraction from deep learning model and MRI-proton density fat fraction1 month

pearson correlation coefficient (r) between estimated fat fraction and MRI-proton density fat fraction

Diagnostic performance (area under the ROC curve (AUC)) of QUS parameters (TAI, TSI) for detection of moderate fatty liver (MRI-PDFF 10, 20 percent)1 month

Reference standard: MRI-PDFF or MR spectroscopy value (10 percent, 15 percent, 15 percent, 20 percent, 25 percent)

- ROC curve analysis of each QUS parameters (TAI, TSI, EzHRI) for the detection of MRI-PDFF \>10, \>20 percent patients

Diagnostic performance (area under the ROC curve (AUC)) of deep leraning model using QUS parametric maps for detection fatty liver (5 percent)1 month

Reference standard: MRI-proton density fat fraction (5 percent)

Intra-observer agreement of quantitative US parameters1 day

Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV) of QUS parameter values (TAI value, TSI value)

Diagnostic performance (area under the ROC curve (AUC)) of deep leraning model using QUS parametric maps for detection fatty liver (10 percent, 15 percent, 15 percent, 20 percent)1 month

Reference standard: MRI-proton density fat fraction (10 percent, 15 percent, 20 percent, 20 percent)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Seoul National University Hospital

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath