Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01433861
NCT01433861TerminatedPhase 3

Phase III Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Laparoscopy-assisted Proximal Gastrectomy (LAPG) and Laparoscopy-assisted Total Gastrectomy (LATG) for Upper Gastric Cancer. (Multicenter Study)

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital1 site in 1 country7 target enrollmentStarted: July 1, 2012Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 3
Status
Terminated
Enrollment
7
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Rate of reflux esophagitis

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The choice of surgical strategy for patients with proximal gastric cancer is controversial mainly because proximal gastrectomy is infamous for high rates of reflux symptoms and anastomotic stricture. but there are no prospective randomized trials until now.

The primary end point of this study is whether the rate of reflux esophagitis is different or not between LAPG and LATG. Through this study, we

Detailed Description

Prospective Randomized Clinical Trials between Laparoscopy-assisted Proximal Gastrectomy and Laparoscopy-assisted Total Gastrectomy.

LAPG reconstruction: double tract reconstruction (3 anastomosis, intracorporeal Roux-en Y esophago-jejunostomy, extracorporeal gastro-jejunostomy 10cm below esophago-jejunostomy,extracorporeal jejuno-jejunostomy 20cm below gastro-jejunostomy)

LATG reconstruction: intracorporeal Roux-en Y esophago-jejunostomy

Primary end point : incidence of reflux esophagitis after operation

Sample Size : LAPG 97 cases, LATG 97 cases (p1=0.018 p2=0.018, a=0.05, b=0.80) Non-inferiority test, non-inferior margin (delta) : 0.05. Sample size calculated by our MRCC(Medical Research Collaborating Center, http://mrcc.snubh.org)

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
20 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Age 20~80
  • •Informed consent
  • •No other malignancies
  • •Proximal gastric cancer met by following conditions
  • •Lesion located on proximal stomach (upper one third)
  • •Lesion below 5cm in size
  • •Lesion confined to proper muscle depth (cT2)
  • •No evidence of metastatic enlarged LN on #5, 6, 4d, 10 basins and other distant metastasis. (cN1)

Exclusion Criteria

  • •If patients is only suitable to total gastrectomy, he will be excluded.

Arms & Interventions

LATG

Active Comparator

LATG : laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy group

Intervention: Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (Procedure)

LAPG

Active Comparator

LAPG : laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction group

Intervention: Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Rate of reflux esophagitis

Time Frame: postoperative 12 month

Comprehesive evaulation by 24hr pH monitoring, DISIDA scan, Endoscopic evaluation according to LA classification and Visick score

Rate of reflux esophagitis

Time Frame: postoperative 3 month

Comprehesive evaulation by 24hr pH monitoring, DISIDA scan, Endoscopic evaluation according to LA classification and Visick score

Rate of reflux esophagitis

Time Frame: postoperative 6 month

Comprehesive evaulation by 24hr pH monitoring, DISIDA scan, Endoscopic evaluation according to LA classification and Visick score

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Hyung-Ho Kim

Professor

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials