CTRI/2021/02/031052Completed未知
Comparison of endotracheal intubation with Macintosh versus King vision video-laryngoscope using COVID-19 barrier box on manikins: A randomised crossover study
I0 sites34 target enrollmentStarted: TBDLast updated:
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- 未知
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 34
Study Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Faculty members and residents of Anaesthesia and Emergency medicine having intubation experience more than 1 year
Exclusion Criteria
- •Faculty members and residents of Anaesthesia and Emergency medicine having intubation experience more than 1 year not willing to take part in the study
Investigators
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparision of three types of endotrracheal tubes on incidence of pneumoniapneumonia.pneumonitis, due to external agentsJ67-J70IRCT2016111430895N1Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences180
Not yet recruiting
Phase 1
Comparison of King vision videolaryngoscopy and Direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in childreCTRI/2020/06/025915one
Recruiting
Phase 3
Evaluation of the effect of endotracheal intubation and laryngeal mask on respiratory parametersIRCT20220612055153N1Bandare-abbas University of Medical Sciences96
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparing which of the three different gadgets between Smarttrach, CMAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes is a better device for intubatioCTRI/2019/09/021279Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences375
Completed
Not Applicable
To compare the ease of endotracheal intubation with a 7cm pillow height versus sniffing position pillow heightCTRI/2022/07/043757DEPARTMENT OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND CRITICAL CARE