Molecule Removal and Ease of Use: A Comparison of Two Different Dialyzers
- Conditions
- Chronic Kidney Disease
- Interventions
- Device: Polyflux 210H dialyzerDevice: Polyflux HD-C4
- Registration Number
- NCT00636389
- Lead Sponsor
- Vantive Health LLC
- Brief Summary
The Polyflux HD-C4 (Gambro Renal Products) is a new dialyzer based on the existing Polyflux H membrane and dialyzer technology, but which achieves a performance comparable to Polyflux 210H in a significantly smaller device.
The objectives of this study are:
1. To compare and contrast small and large molecule removal by the Polyflux HD-C4 and Polyflux 210H dialyzers under conditions of routine hemodialysis; and,
2. To compare and contrast the ease of use of the Polyflux HD-C4 dialyzer with that of the Polyflux 210H under conditions of routine clinical use for hemodialysis.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 12
- Adults 18 years of age or older
- Stable hemodialysis prescription using Polyflux 210H or Polyflux 21R for at least 2 months prior to study enrollment
- Dialyzing through a native fistula or Gore-Tex graft.
- Blood access must be able to provide a blood flow rate of 400 ml/min.
- Non-compliance with dialysis
- Hematocrit less than 28%
- Active Infection
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 210H First, then HD-C4 Polyflux 210H dialyzer Subjects will be randomly assigned to begin the first week of three consecutive treatments with the Polyflux 210H dialyzer. Following the third treatment, the subjects will be switched to the Polyflux HD-C4 dialyzer for a second week of three consecutive treatments. Therefore each subject will have a total of six consecutive dialysis treatments. HD-C4 First, then 210H Polyflux 210H dialyzer Subjects will be randomly assigned to begin the first week of three consecutive treatments with the Polyflux HD-C4 dialyzer. Following the third treatment, the subjects will be switched to the Polyflux 210H dialyzer for a second week of three consecutive treatments. Therefore each subject will have a total of six consecutive dialysis treatments. HD-C4 First, then 210H Polyflux HD-C4 Subjects will be randomly assigned to begin the first week of three consecutive treatments with the Polyflux HD-C4 dialyzer. Following the third treatment, the subjects will be switched to the Polyflux 210H dialyzer for a second week of three consecutive treatments. Therefore each subject will have a total of six consecutive dialysis treatments. 210H First, then HD-C4 Polyflux HD-C4 Subjects will be randomly assigned to begin the first week of three consecutive treatments with the Polyflux 210H dialyzer. Following the third treatment, the subjects will be switched to the Polyflux HD-C4 dialyzer for a second week of three consecutive treatments. Therefore each subject will have a total of six consecutive dialysis treatments.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparison of Urea Removal Under Conditions of Routine Hemodialysis. 2 weeks = duration required for each subject to complete 6 consecutive dialysis treatments Urea removal is correlated with successful clinical outcomes. Kt/V is a way of measuring the delivered dose of dialysis where K=clearance of urea, t=treatment time and V=volume of body water. Single-pool (sp) Kt/V assumes that urea is removed from a single compartment in the human body during dialysis. However, because there are multiple compartments in the human body, rebound occurs following hemodialysis which lowers the Kt/V. Equilibrated (e) Kt/V is an equation that has been devised to predict the amount of rebound based on the ratio of K/V. Outcomes are posted for both spKt/V and eKt/V.
A Comparison of Pre- to Post-dialysis Reduction of Small and Large Molecules Under Conditions of Routine Hemodialysis. 2 weeks = duration required for each subject to complete 6 consecutive dialysis treatments Overall removal of urea, phosphorus and β2-microglobulin was determined from the pre- to post-dialysis change in plasma concentration and from the amount of solute recovered in the dialysate. This outcome measure is reported as the percentage of pre- to post-dialysis reduction of urea, phosphorus and β2-microglobulin.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparison of Dialyzer Ease of Use Between the Polyflux HD-C4 Dialyzer and the Polyflux 210H 2 weeks = duration required for each subject to complete 6 consecutive dialysis treatments Assessment of blood side priming: 1=Very Easy 2=Acceptable 3=Difficult 4=Very Difficult / Assessment of dialysate side priming: 1=Perfect 2=Acceptable 3= Not Acceptable / Appearance of dialyzer fibers: 1=Very Good 2=Good 3=Poor 4=Very Poor / Appearance of dialyzer arterial header: 1=Very Good 2=Good 3=Poor 4=Very Poor / Appearance of venous header: 1=Very Good 2=Good 3=Poor 4=Very Poor /
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
DaVita Clinical Research Facility
🇺🇸Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States