跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07067164
NCT07067164招募中不适用

Clinical Performance of Highly Viscous Glass Ionomer Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite Restorative Materials in Moderate Class II Cavities of Permanent Posterior Teeth " A 12-Month Randomized Clinical Study"

Ain Shams University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 31 人开始时间: 2025年7月1日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
31
试验地点
2
主要终点
Marginal adaptation of the restoration

研究概览

简要总结

Study Title:

Clinical Performance of Highly Viscous Glass Ionomer versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite Restorative Materials in Moderate Class II Cavities of Permanent Posterior Teeth: A 12-Month Randomized Clinical Study

Study Design:

Split-mouth, randomized clinical trial on 31 patients with at least two moderate Class II carious lesions in permanent posterior teeth. Each patient receives two restorations-bulk fill resin composite on one side and highly viscous glass ionomer (HVGIC) on the other.

Aim:

To compare the clinical performance of bulk fill resin composite and HVGIC restorations over 1 week (baseline), 6 months, and 12 months using the modified United States Public Health Services (USPHS) criteria.

Primary Outcome:

Marginal adaptation of the restorations

Secondary Outcomes:

  1. Anatomic form
  2. Contact point
  3. Restoration retention
  4. Marginal discoloration
  5. Surface texture
  6. Color match
  7. Secondary caries
  8. Postoperative sensitivity

Methodology Highlights:

Evaluation by two blinded examiners

Standardized cavity prep and material application

Clinical evaluation using USPHS criteria at all follow-up intervals

Statistical analysis with chi-square, ANOVA, or non-parametric tests as appropriate (R software v4.3.2)

Ethical Considerations:

Approved by the Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University Research Ethics Committee

Informed consent will be obtained from all participants

Significance:

This study helps determine whether HVGIC can be a clinically viable alternative to bulk fill resin composite in moderate Class II cavities, with implications for durability, patient compliance, and cost-effectiveness

详细描述

Title:

Clinical Performance of Highly Viscous Glass Ionomer versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite Restorative Materials in Moderate Class II Cavities of Permanent Posterior Teeth: A 12-Month Randomized Clinical Study

Study Overview:

This study is a prospective, randomized, split-mouth clinical trial designed to compare the clinical performance of bulk fill resin composite and highly viscous glass ionomer (HVGIC) restorative materials in moderate Class II cavities of permanent posterior teeth over a 12-month period. The evaluation of restorations will be based on the modified United States Public Health Services (USPHS) criteria at three time intervals: 1 week (baseline), 6 months, and 12 months post-treatment.

Rationale and Background:

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Participants were unaware of which material was used on each side of the mouth (participant blinding). Two independent, calibrated outcome assessors who were not involved in the treatment procedures and blinded to the allocation evaluated the restorations using the modified USPHS criteria at each follow-up interval.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 45 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients aged 18 to 45 years
  • Systemically healthy individuals
  • Patients with at least two Class II carious lesions (one on each side) in permanent posterior teeth
  • Vital, symptomless teeth
  • Teeth in occlusion and in contact with adjacent natural teeth
  • Healthy periodontal tissues
  • Carious lesions of moderate depth (outer or middle third of dentin radiographically)
  • Patients likely to return for recall visits

排除标准

  • Medically compromised patients
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Poor oral hygiene
  • Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment
  • Patients with parafunctional habits (e.g., bruxism)
  • Extensive lesions requiring cusp coverage
  • Absence of adjacent or opposing teeth

结局指标

主要结局

Marginal adaptation of the restoration

时间窗: 1 week (baseline), 6 months, and 12 months after restoration

Clinical evaluation of the marginal adaptation of bulk fill resin composite and highly viscous glass ionomer restorations in moderate Class II cavities using the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Marginal adaptation will be scored as Alfa (no gap), Bravo (visible defect without dentin exposure), or Charlie (failure with dentin exposure)

次要结局

  • Anatomic form of the restoration(1 week (baseline), 6 months, and 12 months after restoration)
  • Contact point integrity(1 week (baseline), 6 months, and 12 months after restoration)
  • Restoration retention(1 week (baseline), 6 months, and 12 months after restoration)
  • Marginal discoloration(1 week (baseline), 6 months, and 12 months after restoration)
  • Surface texture(1 week (baseline), 6 months, and 12 months after restoration)
  • Color match(1 week (baseline), 6 months, and 12 months after restoration)
  • Presence of secondary caries(1 week (baseline), 6 months, and 12 months after restoration)
  • Postoperative sensitivity(1 week (baseline), 6 months, and 12 months after restoration)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验