Bevacizumab, Etoposide and Cisplatin Followed by Whole Brain Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer With Brain Metastases
- Conditions
- Breast CancerBrain Metastases
- Interventions
- Drug: BEEP regimen
- Registration Number
- NCT02185352
- Lead Sponsor
- National Taiwan University Hospital
- Brief Summary
The primary objective of A-PLUS trial is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of induction BEEP (bevacizumab preconditioning followed by etoposide and cisplatin) followed by whole bran radiotherapy (WBRT) with WBRT alone in the controlling of brain metastases (BM) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients who have not previously received WBRT.
In past 2 years, the research team has demonstrated that BEEP regimen is a highly effective treatment for brain metastases of breast cancer progressing from WBRT by a multi-center phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01281696). The basic concept of preconditioning, as referred to starting bevacizumab 1 day before chemotherapy, is that the effect of bevacizumab induced tumor vascular normalization takes time to mature.
The investigators hypothesized that as induction BEEP decreased the size of brain tumors, the effectiveness of WBRT would be maximized. The investigators expect this integrated approach will do greater benefit to MBC patients with BM, irrespective of subtype.
- Detailed Description
Brain metastasis (BM) occurs in about 20% to 35% of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. In contrast to recent advances in systemic treatment of MBC, there is much room for improvement in treatment of BM. At present, the standard treatment for inoperable/not suitable for radiosurgery BM is whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), but with only a median overall survival (OS) of 6 to 12 months and a high brain relapse rate ranging from 30% to 100%.
In MBC, 70% to 80% of patients with BM are presented with more than two brain metastatic tumors and are not candidate for both surgical treatment and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Unlike patients with solitary or oligo-brain metastatic tumors, for whom the addition of local treatments such as surgery or SRS has been shown to improve OS and relapse rate; for patients with multiple brain metastases, WBRT remained the only standard treatment and improvements are desperately awaited.
Brain was once considered as a "sanctuary" area for systemic drugs due to the protection of blood-brain-barrier (BBB). Although some preclinical studies suggest that the BBB could be disrupted during the growth of brain metastatic tumor, the amount of chemotherapy drugs be delivered to brain tissue was still far lower than that could be achieved in serum. Bevacizumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor antibody, has shown the ability to "normalize" the peri-tumoral vessels in preclinical models. The investigators hypothesized that with the addition of bevacizumab, the chemotherapy drugs-etoposide and cisplatin, which were shown also to have some activity for BM-will be delivered more efficiently into the once "sanctuary" brain parenchyma, thus increasing the efficacy of BM treatment.
Recently, the research team have demonstrated that bevacizumab preconditioning followed by etoposide and cisplatin (BEEP) is a highly effective treatment for brain metastases of breast cancer progressing from radiotherapy by a multi-center phase II study. The basic concept of preconditioning, as referred to starting bevacizumab 1 day before chemotherapy, is that normalization effect takes time to mature. In that study, 35 patients were enrolled. Twenty seven patients (77.2%; 95%CI 59.9-89.6) achieved brain tumor volumetric response, defined as a ≥50% reduction in the volumetric sum of all measurable brain lesions in the absence of increasing steroid use, development of new brain lesion, or progressive neurologic symptoms. With a median follow-up of 11.0 months, the median CNS progression free survival (PFS) was 6.7 months (95% CI 5.1 to 8.3 months), and OS was 9.4 months (95% CI 7.3 to 11.5 months).
At present, lapatinib is the only molecular targeted agent proven effective for MBC patients with BM. The CNS response rate of first-line lapatinib plus capecitabine was 65% in WBRT-naïve, HER2-positive MBC patients with BM. However, the median CNS PFS is still disappointingly short at 5.5 months and the result is limited to MBC patients who are HER2-positive.
It has been demonstrated that brain tumor size is a predictor of WBRT failure. Given the high response rate of BEEP for BM in our phase II trial, the investigators hypothesized that as induction BEEP decreased the size of BM, the effectiveness of WBRT would also be enhanced. This integrated approach will do greater benefit to MBC patients with BM, irrespective of subtype. Hence, the investigators plan to conduct this randomized phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of induction BEEP followed by WBRT.
Sub study of A-PLUS: A Integrated Study of MRI and PET of The Brain in Evaluation of Neurocognitive Outcomes of Patients with Brain Metastasis Treated by Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy.
The participants of A-PLUS trial may be enrolled in an additional study of this trial. This additional prospective study aims to investigate the neurocognitive outcomes of patients with brain metastases treated by radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The evaluations include neurocognitive assessments, serial MRI and FDG PET-CT (Integrated MR-PET) at before and after the study treatment. A total of 80 participants will be enrolled. The study protocol was approved by the NTUH REC, No. 201412046MINA.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 120
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Inductional BEEP regimen BEEP regimen Induction BEEP regimen: Every 3 weeks a cycle for a total of 3 cycles (around 2 months) * Bevacizumab 15mg/kg IVF on D1 * Etoposide 70 mg/m2 IVF QD, D2-4 * Cisplatin 70 mg/m2 IVF on D2 WBRT: 3000cGy in 10 fractions
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The Brain-specific progression free survival (BS-PFS) 2.5 years To evaluate and compare the brain-specific progression free survival (BS-PFS) of the two treatment arms based on RECIST 1.1.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The 2-month brain-specific objective response rate (BS-ORR) 2 months To compare the 2-month brain-specific objective response rate (BS-ORR) of the two treatment arms based on volumetric analysis (CNS composite response criteria).
Trial Locations
- Locations (8)
Shuang Ho Hospital
🇨🇳New Taipei City, Taiwan
Tri-Service General Hospital
🇨🇳Taipei, Taiwan
Mackay Memorial Hospital
🇨🇳Taipei, Taiwan
China Medical University Hospital
🇨🇳Taichung, Taiwan
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-LinKou
🇨🇳Taoyuan, Taiwan
National Taiwan University Hospital
🇨🇳Taipei, Taiwan
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
🇨🇳Taipei, Taiwan
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
🇨🇳Kaohsiung, Taiwan