Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04568928
NCT04568928
Unknown
Not Applicable

Implementation of Locomotor Training Program Using a Powered Exoskeleton Combined With Functional Electrical Stimulation in Clinical Practice for Persons With an Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury - WHY and HOW to do it?

Laval University1 site in 1 country10 target enrollmentDecember 10, 2020

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
Sponsor
Laval University
Enrollment
10
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change in Modified Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Last Updated
3 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

After partial spinal cord injury, gait deficits may be present and often remain even after intensive rehabilitation. New robotic technologies have recently emerged to help augment the extent of rehabilitation. However, these are complex tools to integrate into clinical practice and little is known about the potential factors that may influence the uptake of a locomotor program using this technology by clinicians. The goal of this project is to bring together researchers, administrators, clinicians and patients to define and implement an overground robotized gait training program in clinic. We will also investigate the added value of leg and trunk muscle stimulation combined with robotic walking training, to see if it could enhance recovery.

Detailed Description

Powered exoskeleton technology represents a promising rehabilitation intervention for persons with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI). The overall aim of the present study is to investigate the implementability of an overground locomotor training program using a powered exoskeleton in persons with a subacute iSCI at the Institut de réadaptation en déficience physique de Québec, with and without functional electrical stimulation (FES). Over the 2-year period of the project, a logic model will be co-developed with stakeholders to support clinicians and administrators in the management of the locomotor training program. Using qualitative and quantitative research methods, we will evaluate the feasibility and perceived barriers/facilitators to the implementation in clinical practice of the training program. Finally, a pre-post design with individuals receiving the intervention either combined with FES or not, will allow quantifying of the benefits of combining FES in addition to robotic gait training on functional walking capacity in persons with a subacute iSCI.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
December 10, 2020
End Date
August 2023
Last Updated
3 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

François Routhier

Full Professor/ Researcher

Laval University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Measure between 5'1" and 6'3" (1.5 and 1.9m)
  • Weigh less than 200 pounds (90kg)
  • Present a diagnosis of incomplete spinal cord injury
  • Have the ability to maintain a standing position and/or have therapeutic walking ability at Stage 1B or more of the Rick Hansen Institute SCI Standing and Walking Assessment Toolkit
  • Present sufficient upper extremity strength and function to use a walker with wheels
  • Femur length between 37 and 49cm
  • Width of hips when seated \<42 cm
  • Obtain approval from a physician to participate in the project
  • Standing tolerance \>15 minutes
  • Respond favourably to functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the main lower extremity muscle groups: (gluteus, quadriceps, hamstrings, dorsiflexors, etc.) as determined by a physiotherapist.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Poor fit of the exoskeleton as determined by the research team
  • Present contraindications to the use of the Indego® exoskeleton as described by the company
  • Present lower extremity skin lesions or sores
  • Any medical condition or co-morbidity that may impair collaboration and participation or making it unsafe to wear the exoskeleton, for example (non-exhaustive list) :
  • Disabling pain.
  • Significant sensory disturbances in the lower limbs that limit safe walking.
  • Cognitive disorders that impair the ability to collaborate.
  • Osteoporosis.
  • Unconsolidated fractures of the lower limbs.
  • Uncontrolled reflex dysautonomia.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in Modified Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)

Time Frame: 2 assessment timepoints: at baseline, at the end of the intervention (1 to 2 weeks later)

A walking endurance test that measures the longest distance covered continuously during a maximum of six minutes.

Change in 10 meter Walk Test (10mWT)

Time Frame: 2 assessment timepoints: at baseline, at the end of the intervention (1 to 2 weeks later)

Measures preferred and maximal walking speeds over 10 meters

Change in Modified Timed Up and Go test (TUG)

Time Frame: 2 assessment timepoints: at baseline, at the end of the intervention (1 to 2 weeks later)

A functional test that assesses sit-to-stand transfers, balance and mobility

Change in Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI-II)

Time Frame: 2 assessment timepoints: at baseline, at the end of the intervention (1 to 2 weeks later)

functional walking capacity scale that describes the amount of physical assistance, braces or devices required to walk 10 meters

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in Brief pain inventory questionnaire(2 assessment timepoints: at baseline, at the end of the intervention (1 to 2 weeks later))
  • Change in electromyographic (EMG) activity of the tibialis anterior, triceps surae, quadriceps, hamstrings muscles during walking.will be recorded using a Delsys Trigno system.(2 assessment timepoints: at baseline, at the end of the intervention (1 to 2 weeks later))
  • Change in Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditions scale (SCI-SCS)(2 assessment timepoints: at baseline, at the end of the intervention (1 to 2 weeks later))
  • Change in the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)(2 assessment timepoints: at baseline, at the end of the intervention (1 to 2 weeks later))

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials