Evaluation of Perineural Catheterization Practices in Postoperative Orthopedic Surgery
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 7
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Comparison between sensory Block Quality and motor Block deep
研究概览
简要总结
Continuous peripheral nerve blocks are considered as the gold standard for postoperative analgesia in orthopaedic surgery (shoulder, knee, foot). These techniques are also used in chronic pain.
The main disadvantage of these techniques is that they can drive a more or less deep motor block that slows down the rehabilitation process. This disadvantage could be prevented (or minimized) by adapting the protocol for administering local anesthetics or by changing molecules (levobupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml instead of ropivacaine 2 mg/ml). There is no literature comparing the effectiveness of the sensory block and its impact on the motor block according to the administration protocol and/or the type of local anesthetics.
The main judgement criterion of such a study could be a composite criterion crossing the quality of the sensory block and the depth of the motor blockades, the ideal being to have a perfect sensory block without any motor block.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •>18 years old
- •ASA score 1 to 4
- •Scheduled orthopaedic surgery
- •consent to participate
排除标准
- •Pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding woman
- •Emergency situation
- •Contraindications to local anaesthesia
- •Patient refusal
结局指标
主要结局
Comparison between sensory Block Quality and motor Block deep
时间窗: Day1 to Day 3
Composite score between 0 to 2 for Sensory Block and 0 to 2 for motor Block
次要结局
未报告次要终点
