Treatment efficiency of two initial orthodontic wires-is there a difference?
Phase 1
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/03/031853
- Lead Sponsor
- ASLA P
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Angles Class I or Class II malocclusion, Age group 12 to 18 years, Littles irregularity index of minimum 7 mm, Patients with absence of periodontal diseases, No history of medical problems or medications that could influence pain perception
Exclusion Criteria
Malocclusion correction required treatment procedures other than continuous arch wire mechanics, Patients who had undergone previous active orthodontic treatment, Patients with relevant medical history, Participants taking pain medications for chronic pain, Participants with a positive history of dental pain or pain in the orofacial region
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the efficiency of alignment of crowding in the maxillary anterior segment between graded CuNiTi with conventional CuNiTi arch wiresTimepoint: After 4 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Compare the associated painTimepoint: After 4 months;Compare the differences in maxillary incisor inclinationTimepoint: After 4 months;Compare the differences in maxillary inter canine widthTimepoint: After 4 months