Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01613651
NCT01613651
Completed
Phase 3

A Prospective Randomized Trial of Pelvic Drain Placement Versus no Pelvic Drain Placement After Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy (RALP) in Patients With Prostate Cancer

City of Hope Medical Center1 site in 1 country191 target enrollmentAugust 24, 2012

Overview

Phase
Phase 3
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Perioperative/Postoperative Complications
Sponsor
City of Hope Medical Center
Enrollment
191
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Incidence of early postoperative adverse events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0 (CTCAE 4.0)
Status
Completed
Last Updated
8 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This randomized phase III trial studies robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) with pelvic drain placement to see how well it works compared to RALP without pelvic drain replacement in reducing adverse events after surgery in patients with prostate cancer.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine if eliminating placement of a pelvic drain in patients during robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) increases incidence of early postoperative adverse events occurring within 90 days from prostatectomy, compared to patients who have a pelvic drain placed during RALP. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the incidence of early postoperative adverse events in patients with and without a pelvic drain when adjustments to confounders associated with these events are made (confounders: demographic, surgical and pathologic; age, body mass index \[BMI\], pathologic stage, Gleason sum, extent of lymph node dissection). II. To report peri-operative and postoperative outcomes, including but not limited to, length of hospital stay, re-admissions, continence, potency and incidence of medical interventions for patients with and without pelvic drain. III. To compare early postoperative adverse event rates between patients with and without a pelvic drain in patients who had extended pelvic lymph node dissection during RALP. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM I: Patients undergo RALP. ARM II: Patients undergo RALP and placement of pelvic drain. After completion of treatment, patients are followed up at 1 week and then 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
August 24, 2012
End Date
September 11, 2017
Last Updated
8 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
Male

Investigators

Sponsor
City of Hope Medical Center
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Male patients diagnosed with prostate cancer and scheduled to undergo RALP at City of Hope National Medical Center
  • Written informed consent obtained in accordance with institutional policies approved by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • Patients with prior transurethral resection and other prostate procedures are eligible with the exception of the procedures indicated in the exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • Non-compliance
  • Prior radiotherapy to the pelvis or prostate
  • Prior extensive pelvic surgery such as low anterior reception, abdomino-perineal resection, or proctocolectomy continent stool pouch, or any other extensive abdomino-pelvic surgery that would render the patient high-rick for complications as deemed by the surgeon
  • Demonstrated intra-operative anastomotic leakage when irrigated with 120 mL of normal saline at the end of surgery
  • Intra-operative injuries (for example: rectal injury)
  • Inadequate hemostasis

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Incidence of early postoperative adverse events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0 (CTCAE 4.0)

Time Frame: Within 90 days from prostatectomy

The observed rate of adverse events among patients on the two arms of the study will be compared using a one-sided non-inferiority test with the intent to rule out a 10% or greater difference in postoperative adverse event rates.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Incidence of early postoperative adverse events in patients with and without pelvic drain with adjustments applied to confounders associated with these events according to CTCAE 4.0(Within 90 days post prostatectomy)
  • Peri-operative outcomes for patients with and without a pelvic drain, including continence and potency(Up to 12 months)
  • Incidence of early postoperative adverse events from prostatectomy in patients with and without a pelvic drain who had an extended pelvic lymph node dissection during RALP according to CTCAE 4.0(Within 90 days from prostatectomy)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials