跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02095743
NCT02095743Unknown2 期

Phase II Randomised Study Comparing the Tolerance of PICC Line (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) and Implanted Port for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in HER2-negative Early Breast Cancer

Centre Henri Becquerel2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 256 人开始时间: 2014年4月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
2 期
入组人数
256
试验地点
2
主要终点
Probability of occurrence of a significant adverse event related to the central venous device

研究概览

简要总结

Adjuvant chemotherapy is frequently proposed to patients presenting early breast cancer, in case of high risk of recurrence (large tumors, node involvement, high grade...). Due to its toxicity toward veins, chemotherapy must be administered through a central venous device. Today, one can use either an implanted port or a PICC line (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter). A PICC line is easier to implant and to explant, but has to be flushed every week and may impact daily life (no swimming, some clothes may not fit). On the other hand, a port is subcutaneous and lets patients lead a normal life, but its implant and explant require a cutaneous incision with possible complications (bleeding, pain, infection). For both venous devices, complications such as thrombosis or infection may happen. Published data comparing the two devices are heterogeneous and do not often distinguish patients treated for different diseases at various stages. Empirically in daily practice, for long term use (>6 months) a port is usually preferred, whereas for short-term treatments (<6 weeks) a PICC line is used. In the case of Her2 negative early breast cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy usually lasts 4 to 5 months. There is no scientific evidence for preferring one device to the other for these patients.

The aim of this study is to prospectively compare the patients' satisfaction and tolerance of each of the two devices.

详细描述

The intravenous device will be randomly attributed. The adjuvant chemotherapy regimen will be selected according the standards of the center ( 6 cycles of FEC100 or 3 cycles of FEC100 then 3 cycles of Taxotere (docetaxel). The patient will be followed as per center's standards and visits (prior, during and after every drug administration, then monthly for six months). All Adverse Events will be reported.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Women age > 18
  • Documented breast cancer
  • No Her2 overexpression
  • Patients operated with curative intent (no distant metastasis at diagnosis)
  • Patients undergoing an adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of 3 courses of FEC 100 (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin 100mg/m² and cyclophosphamide ) followed by 3 courses of Taxotere, or 6FEC100 (according to CHB refencial for localised breast cancer treatment).
  • Signed informed consent

排除标准

  • Bilateral axillary node dissection
  • History of bilateral upper thoracic irradiation
  • Cutaneous disease (eczema, scleroderma, infection...) at catheter insertion site (arm or upper thorax)
  • Recent thrombosis of the upper body
  • Therapeutic anticoagulation
  • Tracheotomy
  • Treatment for bacteriemia in process
  • Altered hemostasis: INR > 1.5 ; APTT > 1.5 , platelets < 60 G/l
  • Renal failure with creatinine clearance < 60mL/min
  • Involvement in another trial
  • Contraindication to chemotherapy by FEC 100 or taxotere
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Protected major patient (under guardianship).
  • Psychosocial disorders : decompensated mental disorders, no social security coverage, patient who does not speak french

研究组 & 干预措施

PICC line

Experimental

Use of a PICC line for chemo administration (PowerPICC SOLO²)

干预措施: Use of a PICC line for chemo administration (PowerPICC SOLO²) (Device)

Implanted Port

Active Comparator

Use of an implanted port for chemo administration

干预措施: implanted port for chemo administration (X-port isp) (Device)

Implanted Port

Active Comparator

Use of an implanted port for chemo administration

干预措施: Use of a PICC line for chemo administration (PowerPICC SOLO²) (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Probability of occurrence of a significant adverse event related to the central venous device

时间窗: 37 weeks

To define between the two device (PICC line and implanted port) which one provides the less probability of occurrence of a significant adverse event related to the device (SAERD), from the insertion to the first consultation of survey (36-38 weeks after implantation of the device which is also 5 months after its ablation).

次要结局

  • Patients' satisfaction for the use of their central venous device(1 year)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Tolerance of PICC Line Versus Implanted Port for... | 临床试验