MedPath

Nasal and Oronasal Mask in Severe OSA Patients With Nasal Free Airflow of Obstruction

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Obstructive Sleep Apnea of Newborn
Interventions
Device: Oronasal CPAP
Device: Nasal CPAP
Registration Number
NCT02274194
Lead Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
Brief Summary

The obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) affects between 10% to 25% of the adults. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the first choice of treatment in severe OSA. However, the adherence to CPAP varies, and the interface between patient and the CPAP may interfere with adherence, comfort and efficiency as well as in sleep variables. Objectives: (1) to determine if self-reported airflow route (nasal or oronasal airflow) is the same as the route determined in a laboratory analysis in controls (healthy subjects) and severe OSA patients with nasal free airflow of obstruction during asleep and awake, (2) to compare the effects of nasal and oronasal CPAP titration (randomized order of masks, 14 days apart) on apnoea-hypopnoea index, CPAP level, PSG variables - including analysis for body positioning, the airway defense mechanisms (nasal mucociliary clearance, mucus properties, citology and inflammation in nasal lavage fluid) and systemic effects (serum miRNA expression and cytokines), (3) CPAP adherence after 1 month and 12 months.

Detailed Description

After agreement with the written informed consent, 30 volunteers (10 healthy volunteers and 20 patients with severe OSA), male and female, aged \> 21 years were recruited in the Sleep Laboratory of Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina (FMUSP). The volunteers were evaluated at the Sleep Laboratory (Incor) in two phases. First Phase: volunteers were assessed for breathing route awake and asleep (including respiratory events in OSA patients) and were indicated as nasal breathing and oronasal breathing. Second phase for OSA patients: two manual full-night CPAP titration with nasal and oronasal masks in a randomized order, 14 days apart. Data and fluids were analyzed before and after both titration studies comparing both masks including supine and lateral position during asleep and CPAP titration. Third phase for OSA patiens: patients were treated with the best interface found in CPAP titration study during 30 days and patients were assessed for sleep quality, excessive sonolence during the day, airway symptoms, airway defense mechanisms biomarkers (mucociliary clearance, mucus properties, citology, inflammation cytokines and adhesion molecules and others) and serum cytokines and miRNA.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
25
Inclusion Criteria
  • >21 years
  • moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea
  • nonsmokers
  • ex smokers (cessation >12 months)
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • infection / acute respiratory inflammation (30 days after to study entry)
  • history of fixed nasal obstruction
  • nasal or upper airways surgery
  • chronic diseases without optimized treatment
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Oronasal CPAP during titrationOronasal CPAPGroup oronasal mask: use of CPAP for one night with wash out of two weeks.
Nasal CPAP during titrationNasal CPAPGroup nasal mask: use of CPAP for one night whit wash out of two weeks
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Changes in Apnea-Hypopnea IndexBaseline (Time 0), after CPAP titration with nasal and oronasal mask (one night with wash out of two weeks) and after 30-day period of treatment

A full-night diagnostic polysomnography (PSG) was performed in each subject to determine the stages of sleep, an electroencephalogram, electro-oculogram and electromyogram of the submentalis muscle were obtained. Peripheric blood oxygenation was recorded with the use of a finger pulse oximeter. Thoracoabdominal excursions were measured qualitatively using respiratory effort sensors placed over the ribcage and abdomen. Snoring was detected with a vibration snore sensor and body posture with a body position sensor. Subjects used a molded single-piece translucent silicone rubber mask. During titration, a mask with CPAP was added and the procedure was performed according to AASM guidelines.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Airway inflammation by exhaled breath condensate pHParticipants will be assessed at baseline (Time 0), nasal CPAP, oronasal CPAP and after 30-day CPAP treatment (30 days)

The EBC sample was collected over 15 min of quiet and normal breathings (regular tidal volumes and respiratory rate) through a mouthpiece that was connected to a collector device. Participants were asked to avoid to eat green vegetables and canned or embebbed food the 24 hours before measurements. Ph measurements were performed after dearation with ultrapure argon gas (99.9%).

Sleep quality by Pittsburg QuestionnaireParticipants will be assessed at at baseline (Time 0) and after CPAP treatment (30 days)

It is a questionnaire to assess the quality of sleep (basically 7 components) - cut off \>5: the worst quality

Upper airways symptoms by SNOT20 questionnaireParticipants will be assessed at at baseline (Time 0) and CPAP treatment (30 days)

This is a questionnaire that aims to assess quality of life of patients with chronic upper airways symptoms

Excessive sonolence during daytime by Epworth Sleepiness ScaleParticipants will be assessed at at baseline (Time 0) and CPAP treatment (30 days)

This is a questionnaire about daytime sleepiness with 8 questions. Cut-off \>10: yes

Nasal mucociliary clearance by saccharine transit timeParticipants were assessed at at baseline (Time 0), nasal CPAP, oronasal CPAP and after 30-day CPAP treatment (30 days)

We evaluate the nasal MCC by measuring nasal saccharine transport time (STT). The subject was asked to avoid alcohol, tea and coffee for 6 hours and to eat or drink nothing for 2 hours before the measurements. The STT assessment is performed in a quiet room at a temperature of 21-22ºC and relative humidity of 63-71%. Subjects sat in a chair and are asked to maintain regular breathing, to avoid deep breathing, coughing, sneezing, sniffing or talking during STT measurements. Twenty-five µg saccharin particles are deposited 2 cm from the anterior end of the non-obstructed nostril and the timer is stopped at the first perception of sweet taste. The maximum delay between the deposition and perception is set at 60 minutes for non-detection.

Nasal inflammation by pH, citology and cytokines and adhesion molecules in nasal lavageParticipants were assessed at baseline (Time 0) and after nasal titration, oronasal titration and CPAP treatment (30 days)

TNF-α, IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17, MPO, MIPs, MMPs and cardiovascular panels (multiplex bead assay, Millipore, USA) using ELISA in nasal lavage.

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo

🇧🇷

São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Instituto do Coração - Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

🇧🇷

Sao Paulo, Brazil

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath