跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04389502
NCT04389502Unknown不适用

Efficacy of a Mobile Clinical Decision Support System (CaPtyVa CCR App) to Improve Performance of Gastroenterology and Coloproctology Specialists in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance According to Guideline Recommendations: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Hospital Aleman2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 200 人开始时间: 2020年5月15日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
发起方
入组人数
200
试验地点
2
主要终点
Correct Answers (60% group)

研究概览

简要总结

This prospective study evaluates the use of a (Mobile Decision Support Systems), MDSS (CaPtyVa CCR app) in order to improves gastroenterology and coloproctology specialist's performance in CRC screening and surveillance according to local current guidelines.

详细描述

The proper implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) has the potential to improve health care quality and reduce costs by promoting the use of evidence-based interventions. However, these benefits vary largely according to the way CPGs are put into effect. The behavior of physicians towards CPGs is a determining factor in their successful implementation. It has been suggested that physicians have difficulties in memorizing and processing the complex information contained in CPGs.

Computer-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs) are defined as "any software designed to aid in clinical decision making in which characteristics of individual patients are matched to a computerized knowledge. These systems have shown to: improve prescribing practices, reduce serious medication errors, enhance the delivery of preventive care services, and improve adherence to recommended care standards.

Recent evidence had also suggests that mobile technologies could provide an effective approach in order to allow these Decision Support Systems to be implemented (Mobile Decision Support Systems, MDSS) without requiring personal computers or its integration into other clinical information systems.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a global major medical and public health challenge, accounting for 881.000 deaths annually. Evidence-based CRC screening strategies have shown to be effective in reducing CRC mortality. Hence, the majority of CRC deaths are believed to be the result of CRC screening process breakdowns. Multiple studies report overuse and underuse of colonoscopy, as well as poor physician's knowledge about CRC screening CPG's and their inability to apply them in daily clinical practice. All these factors may threaten the effectiveness of CRC screening programs.

The above mentioned problematic added to recent evidence showing a strong willingness of the physicians to use mobile-based apps in order to assist them in making guideline-concordant recommendations, motivated us to satisfy this need and we developed the first MDSS(CaPtyVa CCR app), to assist physicians in the CRC screening and surveillance task process.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Gastroenterologists and coloproctologists members of four medical societies from Argentina and Uruguay: Endoscopistas de Buenos Aires(ENDIBA), Federación Argentina de Endoscopía Digestiva(FAED), Sociedad Argentina de Coloproctología(SACP) and Sociedad Uruguaya de Endoscopía Digestiva(SUED)

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究组 & 干预措施

CaPtyVa app group

Experimental

Those assigned to the CaPtyVa app group will receive a tutorial video describing its operation and will have to complete 10-item clinical vignette quiz according to the app recommendations based on local current CRC screening and surveillance guidelines on every question. Physicians in this group will download a free of charge application (CaPtyVa CCR APP, Digital Means, Argentina) on their iOs or Android device.

干预措施: CaPtyVa app (Device)

Control group

Active Comparator

The ones assigned to the control group will be asked to complete the 10-item clinical vignette quiz according to their current knowledge on local current CRC screening and surveillance guidelines

干预措施: Control group (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Correct Answers (60% group)

时间窗: 1 month

Proportion of physicians correctly answering at least 60% of the clinical vignettes according to local current guidelines. Responses consistent with the current CRC screening and surveillance guidelines of the Instituto Nacional del Cancer (INC) of Argentina are considered accurate

次要结局

  • Correct Answers (80% group)(1 month)

研究者

发起方
Hospital Aleman
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Lisandro Pereyra

MD

Hospital Aleman

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验