MedPath

The Effect of SRS on Hemiplegia in Stroke Survivors

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Stroke
Interventions
Device: Sensory Threshold
Behavioral: Nine Hole Peg Test
Behavioral: Semmes Weinstein Monofilament Assessment
Registration Number
NCT06357247
Lead Sponsor
Virginia Commonwealth University
Brief Summary

Strokes are one of the leading causes of long term disability and death in the United States. A stroke occurs when the blood supply to the brain is blocked, damaging parts of the brain. Many stroke survivors have difficulty completing dexterous hand movements and manipulating objects due brain damage in the sensorimotor cortex. Damage to these areas can cause decreased motor movements and tactile sensation on the affected side. Research shows that tactile sensation is necessary for maintaining grip, grading grip forces and decreasing object slippage. Therefore, it is important to address tactile sensation with motor performance during stroke rehabilitation to improve performance outcomes among stroke survivors.

Detailed Description

A novel intervention that has shown immediate improvements in tactile sensation is called stochastic resonance stimulation. SRS is a phenomenon where cutaneous sensation can be enhanced with the presence of tactile noise in a nonlinear system. This theory suggests that the application of an imperceptible vibrotactile stimulation increases the synchronization of afferent neurons firing to the somatosensory cortex, ultimately increasing the excitability of mechanoreceptors in the skin suggesting that afferent signals from the periphery to the somatosensory cortex influence motor movements. However, more research is needed to document the changes in motor performance with the use of SRS and it is unclear how SRS stimulation changes different measurable sensory processing differences

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  • Stroke survivors over the age of 18
  • At least six months post stroke
  • Ability to provide verbal informed consent and written informed consent
  • Score of at least 56 on the Fugl meyer assessment total motor scores
  • Able to detect at least 6.65 (300 grams) on the Semmes Weinstein monofilament on both the pads of the thumb and index finger
  • Able to complete the nine hole peg test
  • Able to reliably express pain, discomfort, or fear
  • Speak english
Exclusion Criteria
  • History of upper extremity orthopedic conditions, such as arthritis, surgery, etc.
  • Aphasia caused by stroke
  • Does not have AROM
  • Currently have muscle contractures in upper extremity
  • Participating in other research studies
  • Patients with electrically operated implanted device (e.g. cardiac pacemaker/defibrillator, drug delivery pump, and neurostimulator)
  • History of SMI (e.g. schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder)
  • History of neurodegenerative disability (e.g. Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease)
  • Have received botulinum injections in the paretic limb within the past three months

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Feasibility ArmSemmes Weinstein Monofilament AssessmentWearing a stochastic resonance device at home in chronic stroke patients (six months or more post stroke).
Feasibility ArmSensory ThresholdWearing a stochastic resonance device at home in chronic stroke patients (six months or more post stroke).
Feasibility ArmNine Hole Peg TestWearing a stochastic resonance device at home in chronic stroke patients (six months or more post stroke).
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Scores on ease of use, duration of wear, and preference related to wearing a stochastic resonance device at home in chronic stroke patientsSix months post stroke

To determine the feasibility of wearing a stochastic resonance device at home in chronic stroke patients. This is administered through a participant questionnaire. Some questions are point based (scale of 1-5), and some are open question answers.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Optimal level of stochastic resonance vibrationSix months post stroke

To determine the optimal level of stochastic resonance vibration (120% vs 90% vs 60% of detection threshold) in stroke survivors

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Virginia Commonwealth University

🇺🇸

Richmond, Virginia, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath