Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06408207
NCT06408207
Recruiting
Not Applicable

Randomized Control Trial Evaluating the Impact of CGM Academy Education Curriculum Versus Standard Care on Glycemic Outcomes for Youth With Type 1 Diabetes

Children's Hospital Los Angeles1 site in 1 country90 target enrollmentMay 1, 2025
ConditionsType1 Diabetes
InterventionsCGM Academy

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
CGM Academy
Conditions
Type1 Diabetes
Sponsor
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Enrollment
90
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Mean change in Hemoglobin A1c from baseline to 6 months
Status
Recruiting
Last Updated
2 months ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the effects of a virtual education curriculum in blood glucose variation of youth with type 1 diabetes wearing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device. The main questions the study aims to answer are:

  • Do participants undertaking the proposed curriculum present improved glucose variation than participants of standard education?
  • Explore relationships between participant's glycemic outcomes with diabetes distress, diabetes family responsibilities, and number of hours of diabetes education.

Participants in the intervention group will:

  • receive an interactive workbook with problem-based learning scenarios and video links about CGM and glucose management strategies.
  • participate in four in-depth online group sessions with diabetes care and education specialists
  • complete questionnaires three times: at the time of study enrollment, week 4 and 6 months.

Participants in the comparison group will:

  • receive standard education provided to all patients at CHLA
  • complete questionnaires three times: at the time of study enrollment, week 4 and 6 months.

Detailed Description

Youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) are at increased risk for kidney failure, vision loss, heart disease, and premature mortality due to challenges with glycemic excursions. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems represent an important advance in diabetes technology with significant advantages over self-monitored blood glucose and the potential to optimize glycemic management. Despite these advances, youth with T1D, including patients at Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA), fail to achieve recommended glycemic targets, highlighting the opportunity for testing innovative diabetes education programs aimed at increased technology uptake such as the CGM Academy intervention.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
May 1, 2025
End Date
December 30, 2026
Last Updated
2 months ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Barber, Rebecca

Principal Investigator

Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Current age of 8-18 years, age group eligible for CGM therapy with Dexcom G6 and G7
  • T1D duration ≥6 months, as insulin adjustments during honeymoon stage differs from establishedT1D
  • Able to speak, read, and write English or Spanish
  • Smartphone compatible with Dexcom G6 and G7application
  • Ability to participate in virtual visits

Exclusion Criteria

  • Known history of medical adhesive allergies

Arms & Interventions

CGM Academy

* receive an interactive workbook with problem-based learning scenarios and video links about CGM and glucose management strategies. * participate in four in-depth online group sessions with diabetes care and education specialists * complete questionnaires three times: at the time of study enrollment, week 4 and 6 months.

Intervention: CGM Academy

Standard Diabetes Education

* receive standard education provided to all patients at CHLA * complete questionnaires three times: at the time of study enrollment, week 4 and 6 months.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Mean change in Hemoglobin A1c from baseline to 6 months

Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months

Change in Hemoglobin A1c

Secondary Outcomes

  • Mean change in HbA1c (%) from baseline to 6 months.(Baseline to 6 months)
  • Mean change in CGM metrics measured by CGM readings(Week 4 & 6 months)
  • Change in perceived diabetes distress at baseline, week 4 & 6 months(Baseline, Week 4 & 6 months)
  • Change in perceived diabetes family responsibility at baseline, week 4 & 6 months.(Baseline, week 4 & 6 months)
  • Average number of diabetes educator hours used per study participant at week 4 & 6 months.(Week 4 and 6 months)
  • Perceived benefits of Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) use(week 4 & 6 months)
  • Perceived burden of Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) use(week 4 & 6 months)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials