MedPath

Jawline Improvement Using Patient-specific Angle Implants With Virtual Planning in Orthognathic Surgery

Completed
Conditions
Malocclusion
Registration Number
NCT06235138
Lead Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
Brief Summary

Background: Jawline improvement is nowadays a strong patients' demand. Among patients undergoing orthognathic surgery, it remains sometimes a challenge to manage angle definition due to the classic mandibular osteotomy trait which mostly allows sagittal mandibular movements but can't modify the ramus height. A few types of osteotomies can be used to improve jawline's shape while correcting malocclusion, but they remain technically difficult and often imply the necessity for bone grafting and/or the use of a specific saw and screwdriver. The advent of computer-assisted surgical planning and computer-aided design/ computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) techniques for patient-specific implant (PSI) fabrication has enabled new methods for managing the jawline in orthognathic surgery. The aim of this study was to assess jawline improvement with patient-specific angle implants in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery with standard osteotomies.Methods: A virtual simulation of a Le Fort I osteotomy (if needed), a sagittal split ramus osteotomy with patient-specific titanium angle implants, and a genioplasty (if needed) was conducted on a preoperative three-dimensional (3D) model of each patient's skull using ProPlan CMF software (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). Computer-assisted osteotomy saw-and-drill guides and patient-specific implants (PSIs, titanium plates and angle implants) were produced and used during the surgery. The investigators chose to focus on jawline improvement by comparing the preoperative and the post-operative 3D-photographs using the VECTRA H2 3D imagine system (Canfield Scientific, \*\*).

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria

patients undergoing orthognathic surgery and jawline correction with patient-specific angle implants at Head and Neck Institute, Nice, France *

Exclusion Criteria

None

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Secondary outcome of interest is patients satisfactionFrom post operative week 1 to one year follow-up

Scale title = échelle de Likert. Maximum score 5 (= not satisfied) / minimum score 1 (= total satisfaction)

The primary outcome of interest was the postoperative aspect and position of the gonial anglepostoperative week 4

The primary outcome of interest was the postoperative aspect and position of the gonial angle, assessed by 3D-stereophotogrametry

Secondary outcome of interest is number and type of complicationsFrom post operative week 1 to one year follow-up

Secondary outcome of interest is number and type of complications

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

CHU de Nice

🇫🇷

Nice, Alpes Maritimes, France

CHU NICE

🇫🇷

Nice, Alpes Maritimes, France

CHU de Nice
🇫🇷Nice, Alpes Maritimes, France
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath