Jawline Improvement Using Patient-specific Angle Implants With Virtual Planning in Orthognathic Surgery
- Conditions
- Malocclusion
- Registration Number
- NCT06235138
- Lead Sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
- Brief Summary
Background: Jawline improvement is nowadays a strong patients' demand. Among patients undergoing orthognathic surgery, it remains sometimes a challenge to manage angle definition due to the classic mandibular osteotomy trait which mostly allows sagittal mandibular movements but can't modify the ramus height. A few types of osteotomies can be used to improve jawline's shape while correcting malocclusion, but they remain technically difficult and often imply the necessity for bone grafting and/or the use of a specific saw and screwdriver. The advent of computer-assisted surgical planning and computer-aided design/ computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) techniques for patient-specific implant (PSI) fabrication has enabled new methods for managing the jawline in orthognathic surgery. The aim of this study was to assess jawline improvement with patient-specific angle implants in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery with standard osteotomies.Methods: A virtual simulation of a Le Fort I osteotomy (if needed), a sagittal split ramus osteotomy with patient-specific titanium angle implants, and a genioplasty (if needed) was conducted on a preoperative three-dimensional (3D) model of each patient's skull using ProPlan CMF software (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). Computer-assisted osteotomy saw-and-drill guides and patient-specific implants (PSIs, titanium plates and angle implants) were produced and used during the surgery. The investigators chose to focus on jawline improvement by comparing the preoperative and the post-operative 3D-photographs using the VECTRA H2 3D imagine system (Canfield Scientific, \*\*).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
patients undergoing orthognathic surgery and jawline correction with patient-specific angle implants at Head and Neck Institute, Nice, France *
None
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Secondary outcome of interest is patients satisfaction From post operative week 1 to one year follow-up Scale title = échelle de Likert. Maximum score 5 (= not satisfied) / minimum score 1 (= total satisfaction)
The primary outcome of interest was the postoperative aspect and position of the gonial angle postoperative week 4 The primary outcome of interest was the postoperative aspect and position of the gonial angle, assessed by 3D-stereophotogrametry
Secondary outcome of interest is number and type of complications From post operative week 1 to one year follow-up Secondary outcome of interest is number and type of complications
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
CHU de Nice
🇫🇷Nice, Alpes Maritimes, France
CHU NICE
🇫🇷Nice, Alpes Maritimes, France
CHU de Nice🇫🇷Nice, Alpes Maritimes, France