MedPath

Acupuncture Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis

Not Applicable
Conditions
Knee Osteoarthritis
Interventions
Other: acupuncture
Registration Number
NCT03366363
Lead Sponsor
Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Brief Summary

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA), also called degenerative knee disease, is one of the most common bone and joint diseases in clinic. It was estimated to affect more than 9 million individuals in the United States in 2005 and is a leading cause of disability and medical costs. Most elderly people over the age of 65 have radiographic and/or clinical evidence of osteoarthritis. KOA is a lifelong disease which can lead to obvious pain, joint stiffness, limitation of activity and even joint failure or disability. Acupuncture is a popular treatment taken from ancient Chinese medicine, in which fine needles are placed into the body at specific points. Studies have shown that acupuncture can stimulate nerves under the skin, causing the body to produce natural pain-relieving substances (endorphins). However the evidences of acupuncture for KOA are contradictory. According to the review, intensive acupuncture with three sessions a week is more effective for KOA than sparse acupuncture with one session a week. Moreover, the papers published in the past years suggest that manual acupuncture and electro-acupuncture are most commonly used acupuncture therapy for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of intensive electro-acupuncture or manual acupuncture versus sham acupuncture in reducing pain and improving function in patients with KOA.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
480
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Age 45-75 years old, male or female
  2. Single / bilateral knee pain, duration of more than 6 months
  3. KL (Kellgren-Lawrence) grade Ⅱ or Ⅲ
  4. NRS ≥ 4
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Surgery history of knee or waiting for surgery (knee replacement or knee arthroscopy)
  2. Knee pain caused by other diseases (such as joint bodies, severe effusion of joint cavity, infection, malignant tumors, autoimmune diseases, trauma, fracture, gout, lumbosacral vertebrae disease, etc.)
  3. History of arthroscopy within 1 year or intra-articular injection within 4 months
  4. History of receiving acupuncture or massage treatment within 3 months
  5. Severe acute/chronic organic or mental diseases
  6. Coagulation disorders (such as hemophilia, etc.)
  7. Cardiac pacemaker, metal allergy or needle phobia
  8. Pregnant women, pregnant and lactating women
  9. Participation in another clinical study in the past 3 months

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
manual acupunctureacupunctureParticipants in the manual acupuncture group have the same schedule as the Electro-acupuncture group except that the electrical apparatus has working power indicator and sound without actual current output.
sham acupunctureacupunctureThose in the sham acupuncture group receive shallow acupuncture at non-acupoints without manipulation,Deqi or actual current output.
Electro-acupunctureacupuncture5 compulsory acupoints (ST35、EX-LE5、LR8、GB33 and Ashi) and 3 optional matching acupoints (stomach meridian syndrome:ST34、ST36、ST32、ST40、EX-LE2;gallbladder meridian syndrome:GB31、GB36、GB34、GB39、GB41;bladder meridian syndrome:BL39、BL40、BL57、BL60;San Yin meridian syndrome:LR7、SP9、SP10、KI10、SP4、SP6、LR3、KI3) will be chosen. Needles will be stimulated manually to achieve "De Qi" sensation and an electrical apparatus (Nanjing Jisheng Medical Co., Ltd., wave of 2/100Hz) will be then connected to the needles with alligator clips in pairs LR8-GB33 and two other matching acupoints. The stimulus intensity will be increased until the patient reports a strong but comfortable intensity. Patients will receive 30-minute, 24 sessions intervention over eight weeks.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Response rate8 weeks

the percentage of patients with improvement in average pain (numerical rating scale, NRS) at least 2 units and in Western Ontario and Mcmaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function subscale score at least 6 units at 8 weeks. Pain NRS was a self-administered instrument, a number selected from 0-10 by participant. Intensity of pain range (over past week): 0 =no pain to 10 =worst possible pain. Higher score indicating severe pain. The WOMAC function subscale referred to the participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC function subscale was comprised of 17 questions regarding the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in the study knee. The WOMAC function subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse physical function. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 68 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse physical function.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Knee-joint functionbaseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks and 26 weeks

using WOMAC function subscale. The WOMAC function subscale referred to the participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC function subscale was comprised of 17 questions regarding the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in the study knee. The WOMAC function subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse physical function. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 68 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse physical function.

Knee-joint stiffnessbaseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks and 26 weeks

using WOMAC stiffness subscale. The WOMAC stiffness subscale was comprised of 2 questions regarding the degree of stiffness experienced in the study knee. The WOMAC stiffness subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse stiffness. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 8 (maximum), with higher scores indicating more stiffness.

Expectancy score1 week(after the first treatment)

using Credibility/expectancy questionnaire

Blinding assessment4 weeks and 8 weeks

Blinding assessment will be performed in all 9 centers

Knee-joint painbaseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks and 26 weeks

using WOMAC pain subscale. The WOMAC pain subscale referred to the patient's pain. It was comprised of 5 items, with each item scored from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), where 4 indicated worst pain condition. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 20 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse physical function.

Quality of lifebaseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks and 26 weeks

using 12-Item Short Form Health Survey. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 100(maximum), with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Credibility score1 week(after the first treatment)

using Credibility/expectancy questionnaire

Global effect8 weeks, 16 weeks and 26 weeks

Overall Treatment Effect (extremely improved, slightly improved, not changed, slightly aggravated, extremely aggravated)

Response rate16 weeks, 26 weeks

the percentage of patients with improvement in average pain (numerical rating scale, NRS) at least 2 units and in Western Ontario and Mcmaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function subscale score at least 6 units at 16 and 26 weeks. Pain NRS was a self-administered instrument, a number selected from 0-10 by participant. Intensity of pain range (over past week): 0 =no pain to 10 =worst possible pain. Higher score indicating severe pain. The WOMAC function subscale referred to the participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC function subscale was comprised of 17 questions regarding the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in the study knee. The WOMAC function subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse physical function. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 68 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse physical function.

Adverse eventsfirst treatment up to 8 weeks

Adverse Event Form

Trial Locations

Locations (9)

Beijing Hostipal of Traditional Chinese Medicine affiliated to Capital medical University

🇨🇳

Beijing, Beijing, China

Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine

🇨🇳

Beijing, Beijing, China

First Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

🇨🇳

Tianjin, Tianjin, China

Guang'an Men Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

🇨🇳

Beijing, Beijing, China

Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine

🇨🇳

Beijing, Beijing, China

Hospital of acupuncture-Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

🇨🇳

Beijing, Beijing, China

Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University

🇨🇳

Beijin, Beijing, China

Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University of Chinese Medicine

🇨🇳

Hebei, Hebei, China

Dongfang Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine

🇨🇳

Beijing, Beijing, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath