Acupuncture Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Knee Osteoarthritis

• Registration Number: NCT03366363
• Lead Sponsor: Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Brief Summary

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA), also called degenerative knee disease, is one of the most common bone and joint diseases in clinic. It was estimated to affect more than 9 million individuals in the United States in 2005 and is a leading cause of disability and medical costs. Most elderly people over the age of 65 have radiographic and/or clinical evidence of osteoarthritis. KOA is a lifelong disease which can lead to obvious pain, joint stiffness, limitation of activity and even joint failure or disability. Acupuncture is a popular treatment taken from ancient Chinese medicine, in which fine needles are placed into the body at specific points. Studies have shown that acupuncture can stimulate nerves under the skin, causing the body to produce natural pain-relieving substances (endorphins). However the evidences of acupuncture for KOA are contradictory. According to the review, intensive acupuncture with three sessions a week is more effective for KOA than sparse acupuncture with one session a week. Moreover, the papers published in the past years suggest that manual acupuncture and electro-acupuncture are most commonly used acupuncture therapy for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of intensive electro-acupuncture or manual acupuncture versus sham acupuncture in reducing pain and improving function in patients with KOA.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2017-11-20
• Status Verified: 2017-12
• Study First Submitted QC: 2017-12-03
• Last Update Submitted: 2017-12-03
• Study First Posted: 2017-12-08
• Last Update Posted: 2017-12-08
• Study Start: 2017-12-15
• Primary Completion: 2018-12-31
• Study Completion: 2019-06-30

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 480

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age 45-75 years old, male or female
2. Single / bilateral knee pain, duration of more than 6 months
3. KL (Kellgren-Lawrence) grade Ⅱ or Ⅲ
4. NRS ≥ 4

Exclusion Criteria

1. Surgery history of knee or waiting for surgery (knee replacement or knee arthroscopy)
2. Knee pain caused by other diseases (such as joint bodies, severe effusion of joint cavity, infection, malignant tumors, autoimmune diseases, trauma, fracture, gout, lumbosacral vertebrae disease, etc.)
3. History of arthroscopy within 1 year or intra-articular injection within 4 months
4. History of receiving acupuncture or massage treatment within 3 months
5. Severe acute/chronic organic or mental diseases
6. Coagulation disorders (such as hemophilia, etc.)
7. Cardiac pacemaker, metal allergy or needle phobia
8. Pregnant women, pregnant and lactating women
9. Participation in another clinical study in the past 3 months

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Response rate	8 weeks	the percentage of patients with improvement in average pain (numerical rating scale, NRS) at least 2 units and in Western Ontario and Mcmaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function subscale score at least 6 units at 8 weeks. Pain NRS was a self-administered instrument, a number selected from 0-10 by participant. Intensity of pain range (over past week): 0 =no pain to 10 =worst possible pain. Higher score indicating severe pain. The WOMAC function subscale referred to the participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC function subscale was comprised of 17 questions regarding the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in the study knee. The WOMAC function subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse physical function. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 68 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse physical function.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Knee-joint function	baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks and 26 weeks	using WOMAC function subscale. The WOMAC function subscale referred to the participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC function subscale was comprised of 17 questions regarding the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in the study knee. The WOMAC function subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse physical function. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 68 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse physical function.
Knee-joint stiffness	baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks and 26 weeks	using WOMAC stiffness subscale. The WOMAC stiffness subscale was comprised of 2 questions regarding the degree of stiffness experienced in the study knee. The WOMAC stiffness subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse stiffness. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 8 (maximum), with higher scores indicating more stiffness.
Expectancy score	1 week（after the first treatment）	using Credibility/expectancy questionnaire
Blinding assessment	4 weeks and 8 weeks	Blinding assessment will be performed in all 9 centers
Knee-joint pain	baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks and 26 weeks	using WOMAC pain subscale. The WOMAC pain subscale referred to the patient's pain. It was comprised of 5 items, with each item scored from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), where 4 indicated worst pain condition. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 20 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse physical function.
Quality of life	baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks and 26 weeks	using 12-Item Short Form Health Survey. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 100(maximum), with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Credibility score	1 week（after the first treatment）	using Credibility/expectancy questionnaire
Global effect	8 weeks, 16 weeks and 26 weeks	Overall Treatment Effect (extremely improved, slightly improved, not changed, slightly aggravated, extremely aggravated)
Response rate	16 weeks, 26 weeks	the percentage of patients with improvement in average pain (numerical rating scale, NRS) at least 2 units and in Western Ontario and Mcmaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function subscale score at least 6 units at 16 and 26 weeks. Pain NRS was a self-administered instrument, a number selected from 0-10 by participant. Intensity of pain range (over past week): 0 =no pain to 10 =worst possible pain. Higher score indicating severe pain. The WOMAC function subscale referred to the participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC function subscale was comprised of 17 questions regarding the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in the study knee. The WOMAC function subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse physical function. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 68 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse physical function.
Adverse events	first treatment up to 8 weeks	Adverse Event Form

Trial Locations

Locations (9)

Beijing Hostipal of Traditional Chinese Medicine affiliated to Capital medical University; 🇨🇳 Beijing, Beijing, China

Guang'an Men Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences; 🇨🇳 Beijing, Beijing, China

Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine; 🇨🇳 Beijing, Beijing, China

Dongfang Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine; 🇨🇳 Beijing, Beijing, China

Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine; 🇨🇳 Beijing, Beijing, China

Hospital of acupuncture-Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences; 🇨🇳 Beijing, Beijing, China

Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University; 🇨🇳 Beijin, Beijing, China

Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University of Chinese Medicine; 🇨🇳 Hebei, Hebei, China

First Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine; 🇨🇳 Tianjin, Tianjin, China