跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2025/03/083111
CTRI/2025/03/083111尚未招募不适用

Comparative effects of Manual Diaphragm Technique and Chest Mobilization Techniques on Dyspnea and Chest Excursion in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Himanshika Gautam1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 54 人开始时间: 2025年3月31日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
54
试验地点
1
主要终点
1. Single breath count 2. Chest excursion 3. PFT 4. COPD assessment test

研究概览

简要总结

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is defined by ongoing and typically worsening restrictions in airflow. The primary risk factor is smoking, but the condition is also linked to environmental pollution, workplace exposures, genetic changes, and the effects of aging. It is a diverse lung condition characterized by chronic respiratory symptoms. It results from problems with the air sacs and air passages. It ultimately results in a disruption of airflow that is persistent occasionally gets worsened. However, early detection and treatment of COPD, in addition to lifestyle modifications like discontinuing smoking and exercising regularly, improves the quality of life for those who are affected and minimizes the disease’s progression. This is a diverse condition that exhibits significant differences in how it progresses. It leads to sudden worsening of respiratory symptoms that is linked to varying levels of physiological decline. The MDRT and CMT are effective clinical approaches for managing patients with COPD. They aid in alleviating symptoms such as dyspnea and enhancing chest excursion. Additionally, these techniques have proven beneficial for other conditions like asthma and Neuromuscular Disorders (NMD), positively impacting cardiorespiratory and physiological functions. There is a notable gap in comprehensive evaluations of their effectiveness. This lack of published literature and rigorous assessment makes it challenging to determine how well the techniques work compared to other interventions or therapies. More research is needed to establish clear evidence of their benefits and to understand role in the management of respiratory conditions. There is a need for research to compare the efficacy of both techniques. Identifying which method is more effective could allow healthcare providers to incorporate it alongside standard exercises for these patients. This integration aims to improve their quality of life, shorten hospital stays, and boost lung capacity for those dealing with respiratory challenges.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc
盲法
Participant Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
40.00 Year(s) 至 70.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • •Diagnosed cases of COPD using Gold Standard method.
  • •Both Male and Female.
  • •Age group between 40 years to 70 years.
  • •Patients with an exacerbation of COPD.
  • •Value of Pulmonary Function Test below normal value.
  • •Patients with symptoms of shortness of breath.

排除标准

  • •Patients with unstable vitals
  • •Patients with any active lung infections or any other respiratory conditions such as pneumonia, lung carcinoma
  • •Patients with uncontrolled Diabetes Mellites
  • •Patients of progressive diseases seriously influencing waling ability, amputation, muscular dystrophies, paralysis
  • •Patients with multidrug resistance COPD
  • •Patients with psychological disorders
  • •Patients who are non – cooperative.

结局指标

主要结局

1. Single breath count 2. Chest excursion 3. PFT 4. COPD assessment test

时间窗: at baseline and after one week

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Himanshika Gautam
申办方类型
Other [self]

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验