Validation of the PDQ & DN4.
Recruiting
- Conditions
- europathic painquestionnairesTranslationValidationNeuropathische pijnVragenlijstenVertalingValidatie
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON23306
- Lead Sponsor
- Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
- Brief Summary
/A
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 438
Inclusion Criteria
1. Men & Women;
2. At least 18 years old;
Exclusion Criteria
1. Patients diagnosed with malignancy, compression fractures, ankylosing spondylitis or fibromyalgia;
2. Patients with painful syndromes of unknown origin or associated with diffuse pains, severe mental illness, chronic alcoholism or substance abuse;
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational non invasive
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. Outcome of the gold standard: The clinical examination serves as the goldstandard. Based on the grading system of Treede et al (2008), The gold standard is based on a standardized assessment performed by two independant working physicians;<br /><br>2. Outcome of PDQ & DN4;<br /><br>3. Outcome of Quantitative Sensory testing (QST) in 20% of the study population.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. Medical comorbidity: Questionnaire with the most prevalent and relevant medical;<br /><br>2. Mental health status: Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) (Spinhoven et al. 1997);<br /><br>3. Functioning: Disability Rating Index (DRI) (Salen et al. 1994);<br /><br>4. Health related quality of life: Short form-36 (SF-36);<br /><br>5. Pain Attribution Scale (Kraaimaat 200?). 6. prevalence of neuropathic pain in this patient groups.