Efficacy of Two Flap Palatoplasty (TFP) Versus Furlow With Buccinator Flap (FPBF) During Primary Palatoplasty on the Speech Development
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sponsor
- Fayoum University
- Enrollment
- 30
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- nasopharyngoscopic examination
Study Overview
Brief Summary
About 20 patient will be collected according to the eligibility criteria and grouped into Group I : 10 patients were treated with furlow with buccinators flap Group II : 10 patients were treated with 2 flap palatoplasty All patients will be examined by an expert Phoniatrician by Recording of speech samples in Arabic language for the children in a soundproof room including repeated syllables, sentences with high-pressure sounds and counting from 1 to 10. The records will be analyzed to assess the degree of hypernasality, speech intelligibility and compensatory speech errors
Study Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Observational Model
- Cohort
- Time Perspective
- Cross Sectional
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 3 Years to 5 Years (Child)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •3-5 years old childreen with previous treated complete cleft lip and palate, nonsyndromic.
- •lip and palate repair performed by one craniofacial surgeon
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients with syndromic cleft lip.
- •Redu cases
- •Bilateral cleft lip
- •Patient older 5years or younger 3 years.
- •Associated Cardiac anomalies.
- •Any systemic condition
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
nasopharyngoscopic examination
Time Frame: through study completion, an average one week
this will be done through the nasopharyngoscopic examination of the cleft patients after repair with Furlow with buccinator flap versus two flap palatoplasty. it will assess the grade of velopharyngeal closure during speech
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
Investigators
Shaimaa Mohsen
associate professor of oral and maxillofacial surgery
Fayoum University