Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04721171
NCT04721171
Terminated
N/A

Effectiveness of Electrical Neurostimulation as an Opioid-Sparing Alternative in the Treatment of Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome.

Medical College of Wisconsin1 site in 1 country4 target enrollmentApril 23, 2019

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome
Sponsor
Medical College of Wisconsin
Enrollment
4
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change in Severity of Abdominal Pain
Status
Terminated
Last Updated
4 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

We hypothesize that 1) Neurostimulation via a novel auricular percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation (PENFS) device is a safe, non-invasive opioid-sparing alternative therapy for severe abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting associated with CVS and will reduce the need for opioids. We also hypothesize that 2) PENFS reduces the length of stay (LOS), and improves patient satisfaction. We propose the following specific aim:

Aim 1. Investigate the efficacy of PENFS compared to a sham in patients with CVS seen in the ED or in the clinic or hospitalized with an acute CVS episode.

Objectives:

  1. Demonstrate reduction in abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting using validated tools.
  2. Obviate or reduce the need for opioids.
  3. Reduce the length of hospital stay and improve patient satisfaction.

This approach will specifically address the current opioid problem using a novel, non-invasive neurostimulation therapy with proven efficacy for opioid withdrawal. Long-term, it may improve health care outcomes and significantly reduce overall health care costs.

Detailed Description

Opioid use in CVS and the critical need for opioid sparing therapy Given the lack of knowledge about pathophysiology and evidence-based therapies, patients are often hospitalized to treat symptoms of CVS. During an episode, patients present with severe vomiting and abdominal pain and are treated empirically with IV fluids, antiemetics, benzodiazepines, and opioids. Estimates of opioid use range from 23%-27% in adults with CVS. Patients are often dissatisfied with the level of analgesia as recurrent opioid use results in tolerance and dependence. This often undermines the physician-patient relationship and patients even leave against medical advice out of frustration with what they perceive as ineffective care. This can lead to worse outcomes including recurrent hospitalizations, morbidity and increased health care costs. Preliminary data from a study by our group reveals that of 101 patients hospitalized with CVS at Froedtert Hospital, chronic opioid therapy is associated with a two-fold increased risk of hospitalization (RR 2.22, CI 1.1-4.4, P=0.02) and three-fold increase in hospital length of stay (LOS) (RR 3.43, CI 1.26-9.34, P=0.01). In a study of 132 CVS patients, opioid use was associated with non-response to amitriptyline (53% vs 15%, p\<0.05), a prophylactic therapy used in CVS. This in turn was associated with increased frequency and duration of CVS episodes per year and increased number of hospitalizations/emergency department (ED) visits at baseline (18% vs 15.2%, p\<0.05). Hence there is an urgent need for an opioid-sparing, non-invasive strategy to treat CVS symptoms. In summary, CVS is common and disabling and is associated with significant health care costs. Our proposed project using a novel, non-invasive device to treat CVS will also address the current opioid crisis.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
April 23, 2019
End Date
February 9, 2021
Last Updated
4 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Thangam Venkatesan

Professor

Medical College of Wisconsin

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Developmental delay
  • Non-English speaking patients
  • Pregnancy
  • Any implanted electrical device
  • Any significant dermatological/infectious condition of the ear

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in Severity of Abdominal Pain

Time Frame: The change in abdominal pain will be measured at baseline (before intervention) and then at 2 hours, 24 hours and at 5 days post intervention.

Abdominal pain will be assessed through Visual Analog Scale with the score of ranging from 0 to 10, with 0 being the least and 10 being the worst pain.

Change in Need for Opioids Between Device and Sham

Time Frame: The dose of opioids use ( morphine equivalent) will be measured at baseline (before intervention) and then at 2 hours, 24 hours and at 5 days post intervention.

The amount of opioids used by the patient will be recorded in all subjects and will be converted into morphine equivalents for comparison

Secondary Outcomes

  • Length of Stay in the Hospital (LOS)(LOS will be determined at end of 1 month)
  • Change in Index for Nausea, Vomiting and Retching (INVR) Scores(The INVR scores will be assessed be measured at baseline (before intervention) and then at 2 hours, 24 hours and at 5 days post intervention.)
  • Patient Satisfaction(Patient satisfaction will be assessed at end of 1 month)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials