跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03519269
NCT03519269进行中(未招募)不适用

Conventional vs. Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Clinical, Functional, and Radiographic Outcomes

Columbia University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 99 人开始时间: 2019年4月17日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
入组人数
99
试验地点
2
主要终点
Score on the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)

研究概览

简要总结

Total knee replacement surgery is a conventional approach to alleviating the pain and lack of function resulting from arthritis of the knee. While conventional knee replacement surgery is highly successful, incidences of improperly installed replacement parts are not uncommon. To improve outcomes, robotic-assisted total knee replacement surgery has recently become available, and has been shown to be extremely effective for partial knee replacement surgery. However, further research is needed to determine if this same technology can be equally effective for total knee replacement surgery. The present study will evaluate outcomes of robotic-assisted versus conventional total knee replacement surgery in patients between 40 and 85 years old with end stage arthritis of the knee. Other than surgical technique, patients will receive the same operative care and knee replacement implants. In addition to standard x-rays, subjects will be asked to complete several short-term clinical and functional tests and questionnaires to determine outcomes of their surgery.

详细描述

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is a widespread orthopaedic procedure for restoring functionality and minimizing pain due to end stage osteoarthritis. Conventional TKA, well-accepted as the standard of care, is performed with manual instrumentation guided by intramedullary or extramedullary alignment rods, as well as rotational guides that are not patient-specific. Despite continued improvement in manual instrumentation, postoperative malalignment is still reported in a significant number of patients when these manual instruments are used. Robotic-assisted TKA was developed specifically to improve surgical accuracy, and has been shown to significantly improve accuracy of alignment and joint-line restoration. However, these improvements came at the cost of higher complication rates and were not shown to translate into meaningful clinical outcomes with these first-generation systems. Newer-generation robotic technology offers several advantages over earlier versions including the potential to dynamically assess soft tissues over a range of motion and the ability to use haptic control in bone preparation. Modern robotic-assisted knee surgery has also demonstrated superior outcomes over conventional instrumentation in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). This newer-generation of robotic technology, which has quickly become the standard-of-care for many knee surgeons who perform UKA, has recently been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in TKA. Prior to consideration of widespread adoption of this newer technology in patients undergoing TKA, well-designed clinical trials are necessary to study its efficacy in this population. The proposed study evaluates the efficacy of robotic-assistance in patients between 40 and 85 years old with end-stage knee osteoarthritis or degenerative joint disease undergoing TKA. It is designed as a prospective, randomized trial where patients are blinded to their treatment arm. Patients will be randomized to conventional vs. robotically-assisted techniques in the operating room and, other than the surgical technique, will receive the same perioperative care and identical implants. The investigators aim to measure utility of robotic-assisted TKA through a range of early and short-term clinical, functional, and radiographic outcome measures.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
40 Years 至 85 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • age between 40 and 85
  • body mass index (BMI) less than 40.0 kg/m^2
  • end-stage knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren and Lawrence grade 4)
  • failure of a minimum 12 weeks of nonoperative management
  • English fluency

排除标准

  • history of inflammatory arthropathy in the same knee
  • history of prior open knee surgery in the same knee
  • history of prior osteotomy or periarticular fracture
  • deformity > 15 degrees from a neutral mechanical axis
  • gross ligamentous incompetence of the medial or lateral collateral ligaments
  • musculoskeletal involvement beyond unilateral knee osteoarthritis significantly limiting their function
  • unwillingness or inability to participate in the proposed study protocol and follow-up

研究组 & 干预措施

Non robotics-assisted Surgical System

No Intervention

Conventional, non-robotics-assisted total knee surgical system

Navio™ Robotics-assisted Surgical System

Experimental

Navio™ Robotics-assisted Surgical System

干预措施: Navio™ Robotics-assisted Surgical System (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Score on the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)

时间窗: Up to 2 years

The TUG measures the time (in seconds) it takes a patient to rise from an armed chair, walk 3 meters, turn, and return to sitting in the same chair. The time taken to complete the task is strongly correlated to level of functional mobility, (i.e., the more time taken, the more dependent in activities of daily living). Risk for Falls: high risk (\>13.5 seconds), none/low/moderate (\<13.5 seconds).

Score on Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)

时间窗: Up to 2 years

The WOMAC is a 24-item questionnaire with 3 subscales measuring pain, stiffness, and physical function. Scores are summed for items in each subscale, with possible ranges as follows: pain=0-20, stiffness=0-8, physical function=0-68. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.

次要结局

  • Score on Global Rating Score of Knee Function (GRS)(Up to 2 years)
  • Score on Short-Form 12 Health Questionnaire (SF-12)(Up to 2 years)
  • Score on New Knee Society Scores (2011 KSS)(Up to 2 years)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Herbert John Cooper, MD

Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery

Columbia University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Navio Robotic Versus Conventional Total Knee... | 临床试验