跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06392464
NCT06392464已完成不适用

Clinical Validation Study of Naevia Medical, a Clinical Decision Support System, in Heart Valve Disease

Dilemma Solutions S.L.1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 106 人开始时间: 2024年3月27日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
106
试验地点
1
主要终点
Number of Relevant Appropriate Recommendations

研究概览

简要总结

The study aims to validate naevia medical, a knowledge-based clinical decision support system (CDSS), for clinical benefit and safety in cases of cardiac valvulopathies. Using a series of retrospective clinical cases of heart valve disease, the research will evaluate the number of appropriate and inappropriate recommendations during baseline measurement (conventional management) and after CDSS activation.

详细描述

The objective of this study is to validate both the clinical benefit and safety of a knowledge-based clinical decision support system (CDSS), naevia medical, applied to clinical cases of cardiac valvulopathies.

naevia medical aims to bridge the gap between scientific evidence and medical practice by improving adherence to scientific recommendations.

The research aims to establish and verify that the naevia medical product is suitable for its intended purposes and provides the specified intended functionality as outlined by its manufacturer under normal conditions of use. It seeks to verify the clinical benefits of the product compared to conventional management by enhancing healthcare professionals' ability to provide a greater number of scientifically based recommendations tailored to each patient's specific situation. Additionally, the study aims to establish the clinical safety of the product by identifying potential undesirable side effects under normal usage conditions and evaluating whether these effects constitute acceptable risks in relation to the benefits provided.

To achieve these objectives, a clinical research study will be conducted to assess naevia medical's capacity to increase appropriate recommendations and decrease inappropriate recommendations received by patients with valvulopathy, compared to conventional management without support.

The study proposes a pre-test-post-test design with a randomly assigned group, utilizing a longitudinal approach with repeated measures and retrospective validation. Evaluation criteria will focus on the number of appropriate and inappropriate recommendations during baseline measurement (conventional management) and after CDSS activation, using a series of retrospective clinical cases of heart valve disease.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Control
时间视角
Retrospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 100 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients randomly selected from those presented during the year 2022 in medical-surgical sessions, with a primary diagnosis of:
  • aortic valve stenosis
  • aortic insufficiency
  • mitral valve stenosis
  • mitral insufficiency (greater than moderate severity)..
  • Patients randomly selected from valvulopathy clinic records attended during the year 2022, with a primary diagnosis of
  • aortic valve stenosis
  • aortic insufficiency
  • mitral valve stenosis
  • mitral insufficiency (greater than moderate severity)

排除标准

  • Subjects under 18 years old.
  • Inability to anonymize the case.
  • Clinical cases of valvulopathies in which a complex congenital heart disease coexists.
  • Clinical cases that do not meet the minimum data set necessary for decision-making.
  • Clinical cases with a primary diagnosis other than valvulopathy.
  • Presence of bacterial endocarditis

结局指标

主要结局

Number of Relevant Appropriate Recommendations

时间窗: 1 week

Number of relevant appropriate recommendations. Only high-level recommendations (class I and IIa) were included and evaluated in the study.

Number of Inappropriate Recommendations

时间窗: 1 week

Number of inappropriate recommendations (that do not apply to the specific case)

Number of Relevant Missing Recommendations

时间窗: 1 week

Number of relevant missing recommendations. Only high-level recommendations (class I and IIa) were included and evaluated in the study.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Dilemma Solutions S.L.
申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验