Systematic Development and Test-Retest Reliability of Electronic Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Satisfaction Assessment (EISA)
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 84
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Electronic Instrumental activities of daily living Satisfaction Assessment (EISA)
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this proposed study, is the development and validation of EISA, a Self-report outcome measurement tool, for assessing the satisfaction of everyday functional needs, for consumers using Electronic Assistive Devices (EADs) as the primary means to complete Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs). The EISA outcome measure is proposed to be designed as a questionnaire that can be self or interview-administered to users of EADs. The development of EISA shall be modeled along the lines of development of the self-report outcome measure, Functional Mobility Assessment (FMA) (Kumar et al., 2013). The proposed tool EISA, would serve as a dynamic gage, for assessing perceived user function, related to using EADs for completing IADLs. The instrument is proposed to undergo systematic development in three phases. In phase 1, an initial pool of potential EISA items shall be generated, based on literature review data.
In phase 2, content experts (clinician and EADs user) review panels, shall assess the initial pool of potential EISA items for further content validity. The objective of phase 3, would be a validation of the first iteration of EISA, by establishing reliability for test-retest administration and internal consistency, at acceptable levels, by 25-100 EADs users. Statistical analysis for test-retest reliability and internal consistency estimation shall be carried out in phase 3 of the study, using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24 software.
详细描述
Objective: The purpose of this proposed study, is the development and validation of EISA, a Self-report outcome measurement tool, for assessing satisfaction of everyday functional needs, for consumers using EADs as the primary means to complete IADLs. The EISA outcome measure is proposed to be designed as a questionnaire that can be self or interview administered to users of EADs. Development of EISA shall be modeled along the lines of development of the self-report outcome measure, FMA (Kumar et al., 2013). The proposed tool EISA would serve as a dynamic gauge, for assessing perceived user function, related to using EADs for completing IADLs.
Specific Aims:
The instrument is proposed to undergo systematic development in three phases. In Phase 1, an initial pool of potential EISA items shall be generated, based on literature review data.
In Phase 2, content experts (clinician and EADs user) review panels, shall assess the initial pool of potential EISA items for further content validity. The objective of phase 3, would be validation of the first iteration of EISA, by establishing reliability for test-retest administration and internal consistency, at acceptable levels, by 25-100 EADs users.
Statistical analysis for test-retest reliability and internal consistency estimation shall be carried out using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24 software, in Phase 3 of the study.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Should be an existing user of EADs for at least 3 months
- •Must be 18 years of age or older
- •Should be capable of cognitively reading instructions and answering questions within the Qualtrics online research platform
排除标准
- •Unable to read English
- •Unable to independently answer or have assistance from someone to answer the survey questions
结局指标
主要结局
Electronic Instrumental activities of daily living Satisfaction Assessment (EISA)
时间窗: 6 months
The EISA is a self-report outcome measurement tool, for assessing satisfaction of everyday functional needs, for consumers using Electronic Assistive Devices (EADs) as the primary means to complete IADLs. The EISA outcome measure is proposed to be designed as a questionnaire that can be self or interview administered to users of EADs.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Abbas Quamar
Graduate Student Researcher
University of Pittsburgh
