Effects of Balance Exercises Performed With Different Visual Stimuli
- Conditions
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Interventions
- Other: Balance exercises with Virtual Reality GlassesOther: Balance Exercises with Stroboscopic GlassesOther: Traditional Balance ExercisesOther: Balance Exercises with Visual-Based Metaphor Training
- Registration Number
- NCT06387043
- Lead Sponsor
- Halic University
- Brief Summary
The study aims to examine the effects of balance exercises applied with different visual stimuli on individuals with MS.
- Detailed Description
The study aims to examine the effects of balance exercises applied with virtual reality glasses, stroboscopic glasses, and visual-based metaphor imaginary on individuals with MS, on their balance functions, coordination skills, and quality of life, and to compare these exercises with both traditional balance exercises, and compare each of them on motor learning, based on their effects on representational areas in the brain, and balance.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
- ages of 18-50
- diagnosis of MS by a neurologist according to McDonald 2017 criteria (Carroll, 2018)
- Being between 2.5 and 4.5 on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
- Not having had an attack in the last 3 months
- Absence of spasticity severe enough to affect treatment (spasticity in any joint of the upper extremity and lower extremity is <2 according to the Modified Ashworth Scale)
- Getting ≥ 24 points from the Standardized Mini Mental Test (SMMT)
- hearing or vision problems
- pregnancy
- Having changed medication in the last 3 months and using medication containing the active ingredient Fampridine
- Participating or participating in a regular physiotherapy and rehabilitation program in the last 3 months
- other accompanying neurological, orthopedic or vestibular disorders
- an upper or lower extremity contracture that prevents exercises
- History of epileptic seizure, migraine or vertigo attack in the last 6 months
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Balance Games with Virtual Reality Glasses Balance exercises with Virtual Reality Glasses Individuals with MS in the first group will play balance games with virtual reality glasses for 15 minutes. Three different progressive games will be determined according to the functional level of the individual. Each game offers different gradually increasing difficulty levels and time options. Balance Exercises with Stroboscopic Glasses Balance Exercises with Stroboscopic Glasses Individuals with MS in the second group will be given balance exercises with stroboscopic glasses for 15 minutes. Exercises will be selected in accordance with the functional level of the individual and will progress according to the individual's condition. In each session, 3-5 different exercises will be performed, taking into account the functional status of the individual. Traditional Balance Exercises Traditional Balance Exercises Individuals with MS in the fourth group will be given balance exercises for 15 minutes under the supervision of a researcher physiotherapist. Exercises will be selected in accordance with the functional level of the individual and will progress according to the individual's condition. In each session, 3-5 different exercises will be performed, taking into account the functional status of the individual. Balance Exercises with Visual-Based Metaphor Training Balance Exercises with Visual-Based Metaphor Training Individuals with MS in the third group will be given balance exercises simultaneously with metaphor training using various visuals for 15 minutes. The images will be projected on the screen in front of the individuals and the individuals will be given the command: "Imagine the movement you are doing as in the image." Meanwhile, reinforcers deemed necessary will be used by the researcher physiotherapist to increase the patient's participation and motivation. Static balance exercises in the program will be performed first on stable surfaces and then on unstable surfaces. In each session, 3-5 different exercises will be performed, taking into account the functional status of the individual. The difficulty levels of the exercises will progress by adjusting according to the functional status of the individual.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Timed Up and Go Test Baseline and end of the 8th week It is an assessment tool with strong evidence for its validity as a measure of functional mobility in individuals with MS ( Sebastiao et al., 2016 ).
Functional Reach Test Baseline and end of the 8th week It is an easily applicable dynamic balance measurement technique that has features similar to functional movements. Distances below 15 cm have been found to be associated with an increased risk of falling (Weiner et al., 1992).
Berg Balance Scale Baseline and end of the 8th week Berg Balance Scale is a scale that is widely used to evaluate balance disorders in multiple sclerosis patients (Berg et al., 1989), provides information about the patient's balance function, and is used to evaluate post-rehabilitation improvements (Gervasoni et al., 2016). The scale consists of 14 items for monitoring performance. Each item is scored between 0 and 4; A high score indicates good balance.
Functional Near Infrared Ray Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Baseline and end of the 8th week Functional near-infrared spectroscopy is a device used to evaluate brain functions in the cerebral cortex. This device is an optical brain imaging method that measures the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) response of brain tissues. With this method, relative changes in regional brain oxygenation in the part thought to be associated with brain activation can be determined. In our study, Artinis Brite Lite® fNIRS systems will be used. The system consists of a wearable soft head and has 10 channels. In the evaluation procedure, a trial session will be conducted before the actual measurement, during which the subjects will be fitted with an fNIRS headset. The balance tasks to be evaluated will consist of right and left weight transfer, standing with two feet together, standing on one leg, tandem walking, turning from right to left/left to right, jumping in place and jumping over obstacles (Sathe et al., 2023).
Timed 25 Step Walking Test Baseline and end of the 8th week It will be used to evaluate the walking speed of individuals. In Z25YT, which evaluates lower extremity function, patients are asked to walk a distance of 7.62 m as quickly as possible, but without running and safely, and the completion time is recorded in seconds.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Quality of Life in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Baseline and end of the 8th week Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Scale-54 was developed in 1995 by Vickrey et al. It was developed by (Vickrey et al., 1995); Turkish validity and reliability study by İdiman et al. Made by. The scale examines individuals' health-related quality of life levels with Likert-type scoring in a total of 54 questions prepared specifically for MS disease. Scoring varies between 0-100, with a higher score indicating a better quality of life (İdiman et al., 2006).
Fatigue Severity Scale Baseline and end of the 8th week It is a scale consisting of 9 questions that evaluates fatigue. Each item is scored between 0 and 7. The total score is calculated by taking the arithmetic average of the scores. A score \<4 is interpreted as no fatigue, and a score ≥4 as fatigue (Whitehead, 2009). The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Armutlu et al., (Armutlu et al., 2007).
Lower Extremity Motor Coordination Test Baseline and end of the 8th week This test was developed by Desrosiers et al. to evaluate the lower extremity motor coordination skills of patients with a history of stroke, low back pain and surgery. Developed by. The test begins with the individual sitting on a chair with the knees and ankles at a 90-degree angle. Two red targets with a diameter of 6 cm are placed in front of it, distally and proximally, on a 55x50x0.4 cm mat, with 19 specific localization dimensions. The individual is asked to touch the target closest to the big toe as quickly and smoothly as possible. The number of movements made repetitively, smoothly and as fast as possible within 20 seconds is recorded (Desrosiers et al., 2005).
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Haliç University
🇹🇷Istanbul, Eyüpsultan, Turkey