Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06089629
NCT06089629UnknownNot Applicable

Frenuloplasty for Speech and Myofunctional Outcomes: a Randomized, Controlled Study

The Oregon Clinic0 sites50 target enrollmentStarted: July 1, 2024Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
50
Primary Endpoint
Tongue mobility

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Children with ankyloglossia (tongue tie) can have abnormal tongue function, putting them at a disadvantage when it comes to speech and articulation. Furthermore, abnormal tongue posture within the oral cavity increases the likelihood of myofunctional disorders.

Detailed Description

The current body of literature surrounding ankyloglossia and speed delay is mixed. The literature base is riddled with retrospective reviews, poor descriptions of surgical intervention, and the lack of standardized grading schemes with respect to articulation. Furthermore, the candidacy for intervention in these instances only involves children with anterior tongue tie. There is a complete lack of investigation surrounding the impact of posterior tongue tie on articulation.

The other area that has inadequately been studied is the impact ankyloglossia has on myofunctional outcomes. There are data now that demonstrate how ankyloglossia is correlated with a vaulted palate and has long term orthodontic consequences. This study aims to demonstrate how release of posterior tongue tie improves lingual strength and posture.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
5 Years to 12 Years (Child)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Children ages 5-12 with posterior tongue tie who are undergoing treatment just for ankyloglossia
  • •Children must already be working with an SLP who has done a speech and myofunctional evaluation

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Children undergoing other procedures at the same time as the frenuloplasty (tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy, etc)
  • •Significant medical comorbidities (cardiovascular, neurological, etc)
  • •Anterior tongue tie or lip tie
  • •Previous lingual surgery

Arms & Interventions

Control group

No Intervention

Nonsurgical intervention with speech and myofunctional therapy

Intervention group

Experimental

Surgical intervention with frenuloplasty followed by speech and myofunctional therapy

Intervention: Lingual frenuloplasty (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Tongue mobility

Time Frame: Baseline (timepoint 0) and 2 months post-intervention (surgical group) or 2 months post-therapy alone (control group)

Using the TRMR grading scale

Tongue strength

Time Frame: Baseline (timepoint 0) and 2 months post-intervention (surgical group) or 2 months post-therapy alone (control group)

Using the IOPI instrument

Speech/Articulation

Time Frame: Baseline (timepoint 0) and 2 months post-intervention (surgical group) or 2 months post-therapy alone (control group)

Using the GFTA-3 test of articulation

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Bobak Ghaheri, MD

Otolaryngologist

The Oregon Clinic

Similar Trials