A Prospective, Randomized, Single Center Study to Compare Endotracheal Tube Placement Using McGrath MAC® Video Laryngoscope Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Bariatric Surgery Patients
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 撤回
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Difference in intubation difficulty scale (IDS) score following ETT placement using McGrath MAC® video laryngoscope versus conventional intubation with Macintosh laryngoscope for bariatric surgery patients
研究概览
简要总结
This study aims...
- To assess the difference in intubation difficulty scale (IDS) score following ETT placement using McGrath MAC® video laryngoscope versus conventional intubation with Macintosh laryngoscope for bariatric surgery patients
- To assess the difference in hemodynamic stimulation (airway manipulation) events in both groups
- To assess the overall difference of the duration (seconds) of ETT placement between both groups
- To assess the difference of the duration (seconds) of ETT placement during every attempt (maximum of three attempts) between both groups.
- To assess the difference of STOP BANG score between both groups
- To assess the number of intubation attempts between both groups
详细描述
The failure to place properly an endotracheal tube (ETT) and to secure the airway is still significantly impacting morbidity and mortality in surgical and critical care settings. In addition, no assertive predictor factor will foresee the presence of difficult airway, most of them being acknowledged after anesthesia induction. The incidence of difficult intubation reported in different studies varies from 0.1% to 13%.
The gold standard device to place an ETT that has been used since 1943 is the Macintosh laryngoscope (ML). However, in contemplation of addressing these challenging factors related to endotracheal intubation failure, modern airway devices technology has been developed in order to improve orotracheal visualization, reduce orotracehal manipulation and ensure airway patency.
As part of these novel devices, several video laryngoscopies (VL) have s been developed to secure the airway and improve the management of difficult intubation. Difficult Airway Society (DAS) guidelines recognizes the usefulness of VL in difficult intubation by providing an improved view of the airway to clinicians and directly observe/report the effects of laryngeal manipulation.
Among several VL introduced recently, a McGrath MAC® VL was announced in 2012. McGrath MAC® is a self-contained VL with a single-use blade; its structure is similar to the ML, but without the channel that guides the tube and a mounted LCD screen on the handle that is connected to a miniature camera with a light source at the tip of the blade, allowing the clinicians to directly observe surrounding anatomical airway structures during a tracheal intubation. These features have shown a better glottis visualization and to be supportive during tracheal intubation of difficult airways.
The McGrath MAC® VL and ML are standard of care devices used according to anesthesia care providers' criteria at our institution.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- 未提供
排除标准
- 未提供
结局指标
主要结局
Difference in intubation difficulty scale (IDS) score following ETT placement using McGrath MAC® video laryngoscope versus conventional intubation with Macintosh laryngoscope for bariatric surgery patients
时间窗: Through study completion, on average of 1 week
The Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) is a mixture of subjective and objective conditions that allows a qualitative and quantitative methodology to the progressive nature of the difficulty of intubation (easy=0, slightly difficult= 0\<IDS≤5, moderate to major difficult= 5\<IDS, impossible intubation= ∞). It could be used to asses intubating conditions and methods with the objective of determining the relative values predictive factors of intubation difficulty and of the techniques used to decrease such difficulties. It has seven parameters that are scored after an intubation: # of intubation attempts; # of alternative techniques used; a modified Cormack grade for glottic visualization; subjective impression of the lifting force needed during laryngoscopy; the need for external laryngeal pressure to optimize glottic exposure; and the position of the vocal cords.
次要结局
- Difference in hemodynamic stimulation (airway manipulation) events in both groupsmanipulation in both groups(within 5 minutes after orotracheal intubation)
- Overall difference of the duration (seconds) of ETT placement between both groups(The length of time between the date and time when the start of endotracheal tube descent maneuver until the date and time when the tube is considered well positioned in the trachea, assessed up to 10 minutes)
- Number of intubation attempts between both groups(Procedure (Time starting at first attempt to successful attempt))
- Difference of the duration (seconds) of ETT placement during every attempt (maximum of three attempts) between both groups.(Procedure (The duration of intubation is defined as the time taken from the insertion of the blade beyond the incisors until the verification of the presence of three consecutive normal capnography wave forms.))
- Difference of STOP BANG score between both groups(Baseline (Preoperative))
研究者
Juan Fiorda
Post Doctoral Scholar
Ohio State University