Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04169880
NCT04169880CompletedNot Applicable

Effects of High Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) in Patients With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

Dokuz Eylul University0 sites30 target enrollmentStarted: May 5, 2014Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
30
Primary Endpoint
Pain Evaluation:Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to determine the effects of high intensity laser therapy (HILT) in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS). This study aims to compare the effects of HILT alone and HILT and therapeutic exercise combination on shoulder pain, ROM, joint position sense (JPS), muscle strength and function.The investigators hypothesized that shoulder pain, ROM, JPS, muscle strength and functionality would improve with both treatments but that HILT combined with exercise would result in better outcomes than HILT alone.

Detailed Description

30 patients with SIS will be randomized into two groups. Pain intensity will be assessed with visual analogue scale (VAS), pain-free and normal range of motion (ROM) with goniometer, joint position sense (JPS) with inclinometer, muscle strenght with hand-held dynamometer, and shoulder functionality with Constant Murley Score (CMS) and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) in a pretest-posttest design. HILT Group (n=15) will receive only HILT for 10 sessions, 3 days a week on alternate days. HILT& Exercise Group (n=15) will receive exercise treatment in addition to HILT for the same duration of time.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Participant)

Masking Description

The author who did not perform evaluation or treatment of the patients assessed participants for eligibility and assigned them to one of the two groups; HILT (n=15) and HILT&Exercise (n=15) (Figure 1) by a computerized random number generator (Random.org; Randomness and Integrity Services Ltd, Dublin, Ireland; httpp://www.random.org). Participants did not know there were two groups and which group they were in.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Diagnosed as SIS (≥3 positive of 5 impingement tests: Neer's sign, Hawkins and Kennedy, Empty Can, painful arc of abduction and external rotation resistance tests)
  • No history of shoulder injury and/or shoulder symptoms requiring treatment other than SIS for the last 1 year
  • Shoulder pain less than 7/10 of Visual Analogue Scale
  • Being able to elevate the shoulder over 140 degrees

Exclusion Criteria

  • History of upper extremity fracture, shoulder surgery
  • Frozen shoulder
  • Full-thickness rotator cuff (RC) tear
  • Shoulder instability, systemic musculoskeletal disease
  • Shoulder pain with cervical spine motion,
  • Having any of the contraindications of HILT.

Arms & Interventions

HILT Group

Experimental

HILT Group (n=15)

Intervention: HILT (Device)

HILT & EXERCISE Group

Experimental

HILT&Exercise Group (n=15)

Intervention: HILT & EXERCISE (Combination Product)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Pain Evaluation:Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Time Frame: 4 weeks

Rest and activity pain of the shoulder will be measured on a 10-cm VAS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Higher scores mean worse outcome.

Shoulder Range of Motion Evaluation

Time Frame: 4 weeks

Active and passive ROM will be evaluated with universal goniometer (Baseline®, Fabrication End Inc, New York, USA).

Pain-free Range of Motion Evaluation

Time Frame: 4 weeks

Pain-free ROM will be assessed by measuring pain-free ROM for active shoulder elevation in scapular plane with universal goniometer. While sitting on a chair with back support, patients performed elevation with their thumbs pointing up. One degree below the angle where the patient first experienced pain was recorded.

Muscle Strength Evaluation

Time Frame: 4 weeks

A hand-held dynamometer (HHD) (Power track II, J Tech, New York, USA) will be used to assess muscle strength. Before the evaluations test order will be randomized for lower trapezius (LT), middle trapezius (MT), upper trapezius (UT), serratus anterior (SA), supraspinatus (SupraSp), subscapularis (SubSc), infraspinatus\&teres minor (IS\&TM) muscles.

Shoulder Joint Position Sense (JPS) Evaluation

Time Frame: 4 weeks

A bubble inclinometer (Baseline®, Fabrication End Inc, NewYork, USA) will be used to assess active shoulder JPS. The inclinometer will be attached to an elastic strip via a velcro-band and placed on proximal humerus for abduction and on wrist for rotations. Shoulder JPS in abduction direction will be evaluated while patient sitting on a chair without back support at the angle of 100°, 19 internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER); while patient lying supine, at the angles of 45° IR and 75° ER.

Shoulder Function and Disability Evaluation

Time Frame: 4 weeks

The Turkish version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) will be used to evaluate shoulder disability level. Items in the index are presented on a numerical rating scale (0 indicates no pain/no difficulty, 10 indicates worst pain/most difficulty). Higher score indicates greater disability. The Turkish version of the Constant-Murley Shoulder Score (CMS) will be used to evaluate shoulder function. It is a 100-points-scale composed of pain (15 points), activities of daily living (ADL) (20 points), active ROM (40 points) and strenght (25 points) subgroups. The total score is classified as excellent (90-100), good (80-89), moderate (70-79) and weak (\<70).

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Seda Paskal

Principal Investigator

Dokuz Eylul University

Similar Trials