跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2026/03/106011
CTRI/2026/03/106011尚未招募不适用

THE EFFECT OF ANAESTHESIA TECHNIQUE ON PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOME FOLLOWING VASCULAR REPAIR SURGERY ASSOCIATED WITH POLYTRAUMA

PGIMER CHANDIGARH1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 40 人开始时间: 2026年3月24日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
40
试验地点
1

研究概览

简要总结

Robinson et al. investigated the vascular effects of propofol and demonstrated that its peripheral vasodilatory action is largely mediated through suppression of sympathetic vasoconstrictor nerve activity(22). This mechanism results in a reduction of vascular tone and subsequent vasodilatation. In the context of vascular injury, such pharmacological properties of propofol may be advantageous in mitigating elevated vascular tone and supporting adequate postoperative blood flow(22).

Volatile anaesthetics allow rapid titration and can be advantageous during phases of physiological instability commonly encountered in polytrauma (23). Studies have also found that inhalation anaesthetics cause vascular dilatation, too, more so by sevoflurane compared to isoflurane (24). This could be again beneficial in managing vascular injury where tone is increased. This will help to enhance blood flow.

However, evidence specifically analysing anaesthesia type in orthopedic vascular trauma is scarce. Evidence specific to orthopedic–vascular trauma remains limited; hence, anaesthetic strategies are typically individualized based on patient physiology, anticipated blood loss, injury severity, and the staged nature of damage-control surgery.

Kampman et al. conducted a large multinational meta-analysis involving over 51,000 patients, found no significant differences in all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, or major postoperative complications between TIVA and inhalational anaesthesia (25).

Choi et al., in a randomised trial conducted in an orthopaedic arthroplasty centre, reported no significant differences between TIVA and volatile anaesthesia in postoperative pain scores or opioid requirements in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (26).

Yin et al., in an arthroscopy-focused orthopaedic centre, concluded that both TIVA and sevoflurane provided acceptable operative field visibility and comparable surgical quality during shoulder arthroscopy (27).

研究设计

研究类型
Observational

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 65.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Study Setting A) Study Area The study will be carried out at the Advanced Trauma Centre, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, PGIMER, Chandigarh.
  • B) Study Population The study population will consist of adult polytrauma patients presenting with extremity vascular injuries requiring surgical repair, who meet the defined eligibility criteria and receive either total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) or titrated inhalational anaesthesia (TIA) during the procedure.
  • All consecutive eligible patients admitted over the one-year study period will be included Inclusion Criteria Patients of age 18–65 years with polytrauma, requiring emergency/urgent extremity vascular repair, receiving TIVA or TIA as the primary anaesthetic technique Patients giving consent to participate in the study Patients who have been cleared for surgery after neurosurgery re.

排除标准

  • Severe traumatic brain injury Patient not cleared from neurosurgery Preoperative cardiac arrest Documented allergy to anaesthetic drugs Pregnant patient Patient refusal.

研究者

申办方类型
Research institution and hospital
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

NARESH KUMAR

PGIMER CHANDIGARH

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验